Affiliation:
1. Prehistory and Archaeology Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Campus de Cantoblanco , 28049 Madrid , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to analyze in which way the technical system of the Early Neolithic flint mine of Casa Montero (5350–5220 cal. BC) was organized to manage different flint-based reduction sequences. The particular features and genesis of Casa Montero’s flint limited the efficiency of one of the main goals of the mine: blade production. As a result, a great amount of the extracted raw material was discarded throughout the process. However, an efficiently planned management allowed its reuse for other purposes. One of the key social activities that took place at the mine was knapping apprenticeship. Younger community members were progressively introduced to this complex technical system, taking part in a many-sided set of tasks and parts of the whole production process, from extraction to recycling and waste management. However, knapping learning, as an operative sequence itself, needs a great amount of raw material. By means of the factorial analysis of the relationships between skill levels and raw material varieties and features of blanks, we can understand the complex organization of this technical system in which some strategies were carried out to avoid competition for raw material and allow motivation of apprentices. The spheres of mining, knapping, and learning coexist harmonically and benefit each other. Younger people of the community participated in mining as a workforce, knapping offers them abundant waste to practice, and learning allows social reproduction.
Subject
Education,Archeology,Conservation
Reference30 articles.
1. Audouze, F., & Cattin, M. I. (2011). Flint wealth versus scarcity: Consequences for Magdalenian apprenticeship. Lithic Technology, 36, 109–126. 10.1179/lit.2011.36.2.109.
2. Bamforth, D. B., & Finlay, N. (2008). Introduction. Archaeological approaches to lithic production skill and craft learning. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15, 1–27. 10.1007/s10816-007-9043-3.
3. Bárez, S., Baena, J., Pérez-González, A., Torres, C., Rus, I., & Vega, J. (2016). Acheulian flint quarries in the Madrid Tertiary basin, central Iberian Peninsula: First data obtained from geoarchaeological studies. Quaternary International, 411, 329–348. 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.01.041.
4. Barkai, R., & Gopher, A. (2013). Cultural and biological transformations in the Middle Pleistocene Levant, a view from Qesem Cave, Israel. In T. Akazawa, Y. Nishiaki, & K. Aoki (Eds.), Dynamics of learning in Neanderthals and modern humans, Vol. 1: Cultural perspectives (Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series, pp. 115–140). Tokyo: Springer Science & Business Media. 10.1007/978-4-431-54511-8_7.
5. Bostyn, F., & Lanchon, Y. (Dirs.). (1992). Jablines. Le Haut Château (Seine-et-Marne). Une minière de silex au Néolithique. Documents d’Archéologie Française, 35. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.