Art, Creativity and Automation. From Charters to Shared 3D Visualization Practices

Author:

Opgenhaffen Loes1,Lami Martina Revello2,Mickleburgh Hayley3

Affiliation:

1. ACASA – Department of Archaeology, University of Amsterdam , Turfdraagsterpad 9 , Amsterdam , Netherlands

2. Department of Archaeological Sciences, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University , Leiden , Netherlands

3. Department of Cultural Sciences, Linnaeus University , Växjö , Sweden

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we introduce the themes of the Special Issue on Art, Creativity and Automation. Sharing 3D Visualization Practices in Archaeology, and present the most important outcomes of a roundtable session involving prominent researchers in the field, organized by the authors during the Archon Winter School in February 2020. By assessing the diversity of research aims, artistic projects, creative practices and technology used in the contributions to the Special Issue, and drawing on the thoughts and perspectives generated during the roundtable discussion, we seek to identify shared challenges within the community of visualizers which could ultimately pave the way to shared practices. In this light, we assess whether established charters and guidelines are still relevant in a now matured digital archaeology, where visualization techniques have attained a central position in archaeological knowledge production. Although parts of the guidelines have become common practice, the remainder did not keep up with the fast pace of development of digital practice and its current fundamental role in archaeology, and as a result some of the guidelines risk becoming obstructive in archaeological creative practice.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,Archeology,Conservation

Reference55 articles.

1. Averett, E. W., Gordon, J. M., & Counts, D. B. (Eds.). (2016). Mobilizing the past for a digital future: The potential of digital archaeology. Grand Forks: The Digital Press.

2. Bailey, D. (2017). Disarticulate – Repurpose – Disrupt: Art/archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(4), 691–701. 10.1017/S0959774317000713.

3. Baker, D. (2012). Defining paradata in heritage visualization. In A. Bentkowska-Kafel, D. Baker, & H. Denard (Eds.), Paradata and transparency in virtual heritage (pp. 163–175). Burlington: Ashgate.

4. Barceló, J. A., Forte, M., & Sanders, D. H. (Eds.). (2000). Virtual reality in archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress.

5. Barceló, J. A., Frischer, B., Niccolucci, F., & Ryan, N. (2002). From CVR to CVRO: The past, present, and future of cultural virtual reality. In F. Niccolucci (Ed.), Virtual archaeology between scientific research and territorial marketing. Proceedings of the VAST EuroConference, Arezzo, Italy, November 2000 (pp. 7–18). Arezzo: Archaeopress.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Patterns in paradata preferences among the makers and reusers of archaeological data;Data and Information Management;2024-07

2. Developing a 3D strategy: Pipelines and recommendations for 3D structured light scanning of archaeological artefacts;Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage;2024-06

3. Images of Venice in Valeriano Pastor’s Project for Cannaregio Ovest, 1978;Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies;2022-08-13

4. Digital Explorations in Archive Drawings;Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology;2022-06-30

5. Digital 3D Technologies for Humanities Research and Education: An Overview;Applied Sciences;2022-02-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3