Affiliation:
1. Department of History and Archaeology, University of Barcelona – Institute of Archaeology , 16724 , Montalegre 6 , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Formal analysis of pottery is a commonplace for most archaeologists regardless of the area or period of study. The typological study of utilitarian earthenware is complex and has often been neglected in pottery studies devoted to the analytical characterization of vessels. Certainly, a low degree of variability and standardization can jeopardize a definition of vessel typologies with some sense of universality. Despite this, a global approach dealing with the function or technology of the vessels should also include typological aspects, since they are relevant at the microscale levels and have significance in determining technical choice or distribution. In the last decade, we have analysed and quantified a vast amount of medieval greyware pottery assemblages. The generation of datasets of morphometric variables and their investigation via principal component analysis, among other statistical approaches and graphical representations, has led us to the identification of regional typologies with chronological meaning among these coarse, plain, and highly functional vessels fired under reducing conditions. Clusters resulting from a combined study including up to four diameters, wall thickness, absolute, preserved or reconstructed height, and vector profile measurement allowed us to determine the degree of breakage and to consider this variable in the typological definition.
Subject
Education,Archeology,Conservation
Reference66 articles.
1. Aitchinson, J. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. London: Chapman and Hall.
2. Adroher, A. M., Carreras, C., De Almeida, R., Fernández, A., Molina, J., & Viegas, C. (2016). Registro para la cuantificación de cerámica arqueológica: Estado de la cuestión y una nueva propuesta. Protocolo de Sevilla (prcs/14). Zephyrus, 78, 87–110. doi: 10.14201/zephyrus20167887110.
3. Arcelin-Pradelle, Ch., & Laubenheimer, F. (1985). La notion de série en céramique tournée. In Histoire des techniques et sources documentaires. Méthodes d’approche et expérimentation en région Méditerranéenne. Cahier du G.I.S. n.° 7 (pp. 129–139). Aix-en-Provence: Institut de Recherches Méditerranéennes.
4. Arnold, D. E. (2000). Does the standardization of ceramic pastes really mean specialization?. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4), 333–371. doi: 10.1023/A:1026570906712.
5. Baxter, M. J. (1995). Standardization and transformation in principal component analysis, with applications to archaeometry. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series c (Applied Statistics), 44(4), 513–527. doi: 10.2307/2986142.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献