On Class and Elitism in Archaeology

Author:

Ribeiro Artur1,Giamakis Christos2

Affiliation:

1. SFB 1266, University of Kiel , Kiel , Germany

2. Department of Archaeology, Sheffield University , Sheffield S10 2TN , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract While archaeology is certainly a politically conscious discipline, with various members involved in political and activist movements, especially focusing on gender and race issues, little has been said, discussed, or done with regards to class and elitism. In fact, it seems that since the advent of postmodernity in the 1970s, class and elitism have become moot topics. The aim of this article is to reflect upon class-based discrimination and elitism in archaeology, first by tracing the changes they have undergone, especially during late capitalist times, and how class has become sublimated to fit the neoliberal agenda; second, the article focuses on several issues concerning class and elitism in the university context in general, and in archaeology in particular, and how these serve as barriers to those less wealthy and fortunate; third, this work highlights how these issues concerning class and elitism in archaeology then affect scientific discourse on one hand, which has become more technologically advanced, and consequently more expensive, and archaeological theory on the other, which in its hectic search for novelty has lost its capacity to truly contribute anything new to our understanding of past and present societies.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,Archeology,Conservation

Reference151 articles.

1. Abbot, A. (2020). Stress, anxiety, harassment: Huge survey reveals pressures of scientists’ working lives. Nature, 577, 460–461. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00101-9.

2. Adeluwoye, D. (2019). I thought I’d made it when I got to Cambridge University. How wrong I was Retrieved from. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/23/cambridge-university-upward-mobility-working-class-background. Accessed on the 6th of January 2023.

3. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997 [1947]). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.

4. Agger, B. (2004). Speeding up fast capitalism: Cultures, jobs, families, schools, bodies. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

5. Ahmad, A. (1995). The politics of literary postcoloniality. Race & Class, 36(3), 1–20.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3