Affiliation:
1. SFB 1266, University of Kiel , Kiel , Germany
2. Department of Archaeology, Sheffield University , Sheffield S10 2TN , United Kingdom
Abstract
Abstract
While archaeology is certainly a politically conscious discipline, with various members involved in political and activist movements, especially focusing on gender and race issues, little has been said, discussed, or done with regards to class and elitism. In fact, it seems that since the advent of postmodernity in the 1970s, class and elitism have become moot topics. The aim of this article is to reflect upon class-based discrimination and elitism in archaeology, first by tracing the changes they have undergone, especially during late capitalist times, and how class has become sublimated to fit the neoliberal agenda; second, the article focuses on several issues concerning class and elitism in the university context in general, and in archaeology in particular, and how these serve as barriers to those less wealthy and fortunate; third, this work highlights how these issues concerning class and elitism in archaeology then affect scientific discourse on one hand, which has become more technologically advanced, and consequently more expensive, and archaeological theory on the other, which in its hectic search for novelty has lost its capacity to truly contribute anything new to our understanding of past and present societies.
Subject
Education,Archeology,Conservation
Reference151 articles.
1. Abbot, A. (2020). Stress, anxiety, harassment: Huge survey reveals pressures of scientists’ working lives. Nature, 577, 460–461. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00101-9.
2. Adeluwoye, D. (2019). I thought I’d made it when I got to Cambridge University. How wrong I was Retrieved from. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/23/cambridge-university-upward-mobility-working-class-background. Accessed on the 6th of January 2023.
3. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997 [1947]). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.
4. Agger, B. (2004). Speeding up fast capitalism: Cultures, jobs, families, schools, bodies. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
5. Ahmad, A. (1995). The politics of literary postcoloniality. Race & Class, 36(3), 1–20.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献