Reconciling Contradictory Archaeological Survey Data: A Case Study from Central Crete, Greece

Author:

Drillat Quentin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Archaeology, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Rescue archaeology in urban contexts often opens small windows on ancient settlements that need to be combined to better perceive the history of these settlements. This article suggests that the same combinatory approach should be employed with survey data. Indeed, archaeological surveys can split single ancient settlements into multiple archaeological sites due to visibility changes. It implies that the perception we have of legacy datasets must change: errors in location data might occur in older, and especially pre-GPS, survey datasets, but the fact that more recent projects have not been able to find sites on the exact same spots might also be related to changes in visibility windows. Using a case study from central Crete, Greece, where two survey projects were conducted in the same area, this article suggests that the variability in location data of sites recorded during survey projects can provide new insights into settlement patterns and dynamics. Notably, evidence of grouped settlements is found, including for periods such as Late Minoan II and Late Minoan III C, previously known for a strong decrease in large settlements’ occupation.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference64 articles.

1. Alcock, S. E. (1993). Surveying the peripheries of the hellenistic world. In P. Bilde (Ed.), Centre and periphery in the Hellenistic world: Vol. Studies in Hellenistic civilization (pp. 162–175). Aarhus University Press.

2. Alessandri, L. (2015). Exploring territories: Bubble model and minimum number of contemporary settlements. A case study from Etruria and Latium Vetus from the Early Bronze Age to the Early Iron Age. Origini, XXXVII(1), 175–199.

3. Almagro-Gorbea, M., & Benito-López, J. E. (1996). Control de calidad en resultados en prospección arqueológica. Complutum, 7, 251–264.

4. Almagro-Gorbea, M., Alonso, P., Benito, J. E., Martín, A. M., & Valencia, J. L. (2002). Statistical quality control in archaeological survey. Archaeological Prospection, 9(2), 45–53. doi: 10.1002/arp.179.

5. Ammerman, A. J., Koster, H., & Pfenning, E. (2013). The longitudinal study of land-use at Acconia: Placing the fieldwork of the survey archaeologist in time. Journal of Field Archaeology, 38(4), 291–307. doi: 10.1179/0093469013Z.00000000060.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3