Skeuomorphism in Digital Archeological Practice: A Barrier to Progress, or a Vital Cog in the Wheels of Change?

Author:

Taylor James1,Dell’Unto Nicoló23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Archaeology, University of York , York , United Kingdom

2. Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University , Lund , Sweden

3. Department of Collection Management, Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway

Abstract

Abstract This article focuses on the role of “skeuomorphic technologies” and “skeuomorphs of practice” in the development of digital workflows in archeology, seeking to examine whether there are common trends toward skeuomorphism in our development of digital infrastructures. By considering the way in which GIS, tablet, and 3D technologies were integrated into the digital field recording at the sites of Çatalhöyük in Turkey and Kämpinge in Sweden, we argue that skeuomorphic emulation may form an essential part of the process of “controlling” “socializing” new digital technologies and ultimately transforming digital practice. Ultimately we contend that a field approach that explicitly takes into account skeuomorphism as a crucial element of transformation is more likely to encourage the development of practices, which go behind the traditional investigation paradigms. Understanding the role of skeuomorphism as a mode of socializing technology (see below) within the broader framework of the development of digital field practices can help us to critically address the process of transformation of practice and identify new methodological directions.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,Archeology,Conservation

Reference61 articles.

1. Berggren, Å., & Nilsson, B. (2014). Going back, looking forward: Reflexive archaeology or reflexive method? In I. Hodder (Ed.), Integrating Çatalhöyük. Themes from the 2000–2008 seasons (Vol. 10, pp. 57–70). Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.

2. Berggren, Å, Dell’Unto, N., Forte, M., Haddow, S., Hodder, I., Issavi, J., … Taylor, J. (2015). Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: Integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge. Antiquity, 89(344), 433–448. 10.15184/aqy.2014.43.

3. Bonelli, L. (2016). From skeuomorphism to material design and back. The language of colours in the 2nd generation of mobile interface design. In D. Gadia (Ed.), Colour and colorimetry. Mutidisciplinary contributions (Vol. XII B). Torin: Gruppo del Colore.

4. Brinch Petersen, E. (2015). Diversity of Mesolithic Vedbaek. Acta Archaeologica, 86(1), 7–13.

5. Buccellati, G. (2017). A critique of archaeological reason: Structural, digital, and philosophical aspects of the excavated record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107110298.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3