Affiliation:
1. Ph.D. candidate in Economics, Department of Economics , University of Brasília (UnB) , Brasília , Brazil
Abstract
AbstractThe essay investigates the parallels and connections between Friedrich A. Hayek and Ronald H. Coase. It emphasizes the shared context at the London School of Economics (LSE) in the 1930s within which both authors reacted, in particular the role of the so-called LSE tradition on opportunity cost. We focus attention on the same pattern of institutional reaction to the formal similarity proposition of neoclassical general equilibrium theory exposed in both authors. In “The Nature of the Firm” (1937a), Coase’s pioneer transaction cost argument was decisively constructed and shaped by the controversy around the possibility of rational economic calculation under socialism. This debate was crucial to Hayek’s fundamental reformulation of neoclassical equilibrium analysis in terms of a social coordination problem in “Economics and Knowledge” (1937). In a parallel manner, although focused on the microstructure of production, Coase (1937a) was reacting to the standard general equilibrium theory and its postulates. Traditional microeconomic theory could not explain the decisions to make within the firm or to buy in the market, nor the many hybrid organizational arrangements that lie between the centralized firm and the decentralized market process. In “The Problem of Social Cost” (1960), Coase develops his argument advanced in 1937 to the welfare corollaries of the general equilibrium framework encapsulated in the first and second welfare theorems. In this case, the connection was made through the influential ideas of his long-LSE friend, Abba P. Lerner. Finally, the essay explores Hayek’s instrumental role in the intellectual and institutional foundations of the Law and Economics movement at the University of Chicago.
Subject
Microbiology (medical),Immunology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference151 articles.
1. Alchian, A. A., and H. Demsetz. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” The American Economic Review 62 (5): 777–95.
2. Barone, E. 1908. “Il Ministro della Produzione nello Stato Collettivista.” Giornale degli Economisti 37: 267–93, reprinted in English In Hayek, F. A., ed. 1935a. Collectivist Economic Planning: Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. London: Routledge.
3. Bertrand, E. 2015a. “From the Firm to Economic Policy: The Problem of Coase’s Cost.” History of Political Economy 47 (3): 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3153152.
4. Bertrand, E. 2015b. “An Underrated Originality of “The Problem of Social Cost”: The LSE Source.” History of Economic Ideas 23 (3): 19–43.
5. Boettke, P. J. 1998. “Coase, Communism and the ‘Black Box’ of Soviet-type Economies.” In Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics, edited by S. G. Medema, 193–207. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.