Abstract
AbstractAs physicians, we take pride in our ability to generate, from memory, a complete differential diagnosis for our patients’ presenting symptoms. We expect this of ourselves and our trainees, but we do not do it reliably. Studies have found that the most common cause of diagnostic error is the physician’s failure to consider the correct diagnosis as a possibility. Other professionals, like airline pilots and nuclear plant operators, have accepted the fallibility of their memories and have learned how to ensure reliable completion of critical tasks by using checklists. But our culture in medicine glorifies physicians who complete the critical task of diagnosis using their memories and disparages those who cheat by referring to a list. Recent studies have supported the use of checklists in the operating room and intensive care unit, but so far they have not been used to make diagnosis more reliable. This essay explores a possible use for differential-diagnosis checklists by describing the author’s experience with them in a primary care clinic.
Subject
Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference34 articles.
1. Cognitive and affective dispositions to respond In Schenkel Wears editors Patient safety in emergency medicine Philadelphia;Croskerry,2009
2. and testing of a decision tree for blunt trauma;Shoemaker;Development Crit Care Med,1988
3. Sox Sox CH The training of physician assistants : the use of a clinical algorithm system for patient care audit of performance and;Tompkins;education Engl J Med,1973
4. AN Physicians diagnostic accuracy confidence resource requests Aug;Meyer;JAMA Intern Med,2013
5. Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct ? Implications for decision support and error reduction;Friedman;PS J Gen Intern Med,2005
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献