EU Finalité Conceptions After Brexit: A Comparison of Polish and German Parties

Author:

Mehlhausen Thomas1,Wagstyl Adrian2,Karolewski Ireneusz Pawel1,Grzeszczak Robert2

Affiliation:

1. Leipzig University , Leipzig , Germany

2. Centre for Research on European Institutional Design (CUUE), Faculty of Law, University of Warsaw , Warszawa , Poland

Abstract

Abstract The future of the EU as a laboratory of a transnational community of nations within an increasingly split global community of actors could become ever more relevant, the more the global future of democracy needs transnational cooperation among differently structured democracies. Yet the reality on the ground is complex in the heartland of the respective experimentation as well. Against this backdrop, the article deals with deepening and differentiation of European integration through the prism of two cases: Germany and Poland. While the former is the most populous among fully integrated EU member states, the latter is by now the biggest partially integrated member state having not yet joined the Eurozone, nor showing any inclination to do so in the future. These countries differ in many respects, to name just the Eurozone, defense matters, rule of law, and migration. And yet, in the eyes of some observers, close German-Polish cooperation is just as essential for the future of Europe as the Franco-German partnership. In this sense, the comparison of Poland and Germany promises to unveil problématiques typical for the entire EU, in particular with regard to differentiated integration.

Funder

German-Polish Science Foundation

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference90 articles.

1. Aumer, P. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 21 February, 19th Election Period.” 9774.

2. Baerbock, A. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 23 March, 18th Election Period.” 22547–8.

3. Bakker, R. S., S. Joll, and J. Polk. 2017. “Complexity in the European Party Space: Exploring Dimensionality with Experts.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 219–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512436995.

4. Beer, N. 2022. “Interview with the Authors, 25 January.”

5. Bischoff, G. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 30 August.”

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3