Abstract
Abstract
The article explores epistemic and social conditions of the trustworthiness of scientific expertise. I claim that there are three kinds of conditions for the trustworthiness of scientific expertise. The first condition is epistemic and means that scientific knowledge enjoys high credibility. The second condition concerns the significance of scientific knowledge. It means that scientific generalizations are relevant for elucidating the particular cases that constitute the challenges for expert judgment. The third condition concerns the social processes involved in producing science-based recommendations. In this context trust is created by social robustness, expert legitimacy, and social participation.
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science
Reference9 articles.
1. Gender Politics and the Theoretical Virtues in;Longino;Synthese,1995
2. Inductive Risk and Values in of Border Skirmishes between Science and Policy : Autonomy Responsibility and Values in eds Science Values and Objectivity Pittsburgh Konstanz;Douglas;Philosophy Science,2000
3. Sources of Funding and Outcome of Clinical Trials in of General Internal;Davidson;Journal Medicine,1986
4. Reintroducing Prediction to Explanation in Philosophy of;Douglas;Science,2009
5. Trust Expertise and the Philosophy of Science in;Whyte;Synthese,2010
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献