Affiliation:
1. Department of Mathematics , Whitman College , Walla Walla , WA 99362 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
For a primary abelian group 𝐺, Chekhlov and Danchev (2015) defined three variations of Kaplansky’s notion of full transitivity by restricting one’s attention to the subgroup, the subring and the unitary subring of the endomorphism ring of 𝐺 generated by the collection of all commutator endomorphisms.
They posed the problem of describing exactly which totally projective groups exhibit these forms of full transitivity.
This problem, and some closely related questions, are completely answered using the Ulm function of 𝐺.
Subject
Algebra and Number Theory
Reference7 articles.
1. A. R. Chekhlov and P. V. Danchev,
On commutator fully transitive Abelian groups,
J. Group Theory 18 (2015), no. 4, 623–647.
2. A. R. Chekhlov and P. V. Danchev,
On commutator Krylov transitive and commutator weakly transitive Abelian p-groups,
Forum Math. 31 (2019), no. 6, 1607–1623.
3. L. Fuchs,
Infinite Abelian Groups. Vol. II,
Pure Appl. Math. Vol. 36-II,
Academic Press, New York, 1973.
4. P. Hill,
On transitive and fully transitive primary groups,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (1969), 414–417.
5. R. Hunter, F. Richman and E. Walker,
Existence theorems for Warfield groups,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 235 (1978), 345–362.