Affiliation:
1. Professor of Anthropology; China Agricultural University, Beijing
Abstract
Abstract
Based on archival studies, this paper analyses an “ethnic symposium” organized by the party committee of the Dali Prefecture in 1956. The author argues that determining the Bai as the ethnonym is a process of “name standardization”. It was neither the decision of the state power, nor was it led by the scholar’s opinion, but by the local elites’ deliberate complicity with the state project. It could be thus called a process of “creating a common fate” under the combined principles of the discourse of “liberation-cum-backwardness”, historical evidence, anti-discrimination, legibility to the ordinary member, conformity to the communist value, etc. It defamiliarizes the everyday knowledge of the people and creates a liminal stage in which a shared fate could be felt. Therefore, this paper is not intended to deconstruct the ethnic identity, but attempts to provide the empirical analysis on a sociological issue of knowledge through contextualizing the usage and implication of the word “minzu” (ethnicity, nation).
Reference32 articles.
1. Brown, Melissa (2001) “Ethnic Classification and Culture: The Case of the Tujia in Hubei, China,” Asian Ethnicity 2(1): 55–72.
2. Compiling Team, the(1986) Survey on The Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Chubanshe.[编写 组,1986,《大理白族自治州概况》,昆明:云南民族出版 社。]
3. Dali Commissioner’s Office (1956) Report on the Negotiation of the Ethnonym of the Bai, The Dali Prefectural Archive, Catalogue 001, Index 1, Vol. 179. April 25–26, pp. 199–220. [大理专员公 署,1956,《关于协商白族名称情况报告》,大理白族自治 州档案馆,全宗001,目录1,案卷179,4月25~26日,第199 ~220页。]
4. Davis, R. M. (2009) Yun-nan: The Link Between India and the Yangtze, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Du Yuting (1997) “Reappraisal on the Recognition of the Jinuo Zu: Reflection on the Chinese Minzu Recognition”, Social Sciences in Yunnan no. 6. [杜玉亭,1997,“基诺族识别四十年回识——中国民族识别的宏观思考”,载《云南社会科学》第6期。]