“It’s not the same thing as last time I wrote a report”: Digital text sharing in changing organizations

Author:

Blåsjö Mona1ORCID,Jonsson Carla1

Affiliation:

1. Stockholm University , Stockholm , Sweden

Abstract

Abstract In the communications of modern organizations, text sharing and knowledge management are mainly digital. The digital systems that frame many types of communication consist of, e.g., intranets and document sharing software that are occasionally exchanged for new systems. Employees have to adjust to modified routines and learn new systems, and management has to make decisions about digital systems and how these are to be integrated with work processes and knowledge management. In this article, we contribute to research on work-life literacies by highlighting the increasingly frequent issue of digital text sharing in modern workplaces through the study of commercial companies, mainly through ethnographic observations and interviews. The theoretical framework comes from New Literacy Studies where literacy practices, i.e., common patterns of using reading and writing, form a key concept. Moreover, the sociolinguistic concept of metadiscourse is applied in order to uncover the reflexive orientation of participating professionals towards digital text sharing. The results show that these professionals relate the combination of digital text sharing and technological and organizational change to problems, obstacles and potential risks; ambitions of enhancing digital text sharing may exclude certain groups, and changes in digital text sharing systems per se may cause professionals to lose control. These risks are often associated with access to information: a person who cannot access information in their organization has a lower degree of agency or power over their situation. The results are discussed in light of theories concerning modern work life from New Literacy Studies.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference45 articles.

1. Agha, Asif. 2006. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511618284.

2. Barton, David. 2006. The significance of a social practice view of language, literacy, and numeracy. In Lynn Tett, Mary Hamilton & Yvonne Hillier (eds.), Adult literacy, numeracy and language: Policy, practice, and research, 21–30. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

3. Barton, David. 2009. Understanding textual practices in a changing world. In Mike Baynham & Mastin Prinsloo (eds.), The future of literacy studies, 38–53. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

4. Barton, David & Mary Hamilton. 2000. Literacy practices. In David Barton, Mary Hamilton & Roz Ivanič (eds.), Situated literacies, 7–15. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

5. Barton, David & Mary Hamilton. 2012. Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3