Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemical Engineering , Gazi University , Maltepe , Çankaya Ankara , Türkiye
Abstract
Abstract
Ni-incorporated Mg–Al type hydrotalcite-like catalytic materials were synthesized following impregnation and co-precipitation routes, and their catalytic performances were compared in the dry-reforming reaction of methane. The effects of Ru impregnation on the catalytic performance of Ni-incorporated Mg–Al were also investigated. Results showed that the catalytic performance of the Ni-incorporated Mg–Al type catalyst (NiMgAlO), which was prepared by the co-precipitation route, was highly stable during dry-reforming reaction tests performed at 600 °C, extending up to 24 h. The fractional conversion of CO2 (0.42) was higher than the fractional conversion of CH4 (0.29) due to the contribution of the reverse water gas shift reaction. However, the contribution of the reverse water gas shift reaction to the product distribution was much less with the catalyst prepared following the impregnation route (Ni@MgAlO). This difference was shown to be mainly due to the state of the nickel in the catalyst structures. Ni-impregnated Ca–Al type hydrotalcite-like catalyst (Ni@CaAlO) was also synthesized and tested in dry reforming of methane. Results obtained with the Ni-impregnated Ca–Al type catalyst showed some changes in its structure and the formation of some CaCO3 during the dry reforming reaction. The comparison of the performances of Ni-impregnated Mg–Al and Ca–Al type catalysts showed a higher amount of coke on the surface of Ni@CaAlO than Ni@MgAlO. It was also concluded that significant coke minimization and highly stable catalytic performance could be achieved by the impregnation of 1 % Ru to the NiMgAlO catalyst. The amount of coke deposited on the catalyst decreased from about 30 % to less than 5 %, by Ru impregnation. The decrease of the surface area of the Ru-impregnated catalyst was also only about 3 % after 240 min of reaction time.
Funder
Gazi University Research Fund for laboratory expenses
Reference55 articles.
1. Z. Alipour, V. B. Borugadda, H. Wang, and A. K. Dalai, “Syngas production through dry reforming: a review on catalysts and their materials, preparation methods and reactor type,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 452, p. 139416, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139416.
2. P. K. Chaudhary and G. Deo, “Process and catalyst improvements for the dry reforming of methane,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 276, p. 118767, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.118767.
3. J. M. Ginsburg, J. Pina, T. El Solh, and H. de Lasa, “Coke formation over a nickel catalyst under methane dry reforming conditions: thermodynamic and kinetic models,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 44, pp. 4846–4854, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0496333.
4. R. Kumar, A. Kumar, and A. Pal, “Overview of hydrogen production from biogas reforming: technological advancement,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, pp. 34831–34855, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.059.
5. X. Verykios, “Catalytic dry reforming of natural gas for the production of chemicals and hydrogen,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 28, pp. 1045–1063, 2005.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献