CFD simulation for comparative of hydrodynamic effects in biochemical reactors using population balance model with varied inlet gas distribution profiles
Author:
Ni Shenzhou12, Zhao Tong12, Sun Zehui3, Wang Wei12, Su Kuizu12
Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil Engineering , Hefei University of Technology , Hefei 230009 , China 2. Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Rural Water Environment and Resources , Hefei 230009 , China 3. Department of Mechanical , Anhui University , Hefei 230601 , China
Abstract
Abstract
The operational efficiency of the airlift reactors relies significantly on the aeration and mixing provided by the inlet system. The diffused aeration system is the most energy-intensive component affecting the operation of the bioreactor, accounting for 45–75 % of the energy costs. This study presents a coupled CFD-PBM to investigate the collective impacts of multiple bubble diameters, variations in inlet gas distribution types, and flow rates on the hydrodynamic characteristics of bubble columns. The simulation results were validated through comprehensive comparisons with experimental data. The experimental data and simulations of the single bubble size model (SBSM) and multi-bubble size model (MBSM) were compared, proposing an enhanced inlet gas distribution type. The results indicate a close resemblance between the MBSM data and the experimental results, with an error margin not exceeding 5 %. Moreover, different flow rates were found to cause varying sensitivities in the bubble size distribution (BSD) within the column. Furthermore, the simulation results validate the similarity between lift coefficients and critical diameters to experiments and shed light on favorable conditions for reactor design. The key findings of this study encompass: (1) the use of MBSM can accurately predict the tower system characteristics; (2) the column circulation is intensified with small inlet bubble size and high gas velocity, which is favorable for chemical reactions and microbial aggregation to proceed; and (3) the BSD is not sensitive to the inlet gas distribution type at high flow rates.
Funder
The Key Common Technology Research and Development Project of Hefei The National Natural Science Foundation of China The National Key R&D Program of China Science and Technology Projects of Anhui Provincial Group Limited for Yangtze-To-Huaihe Water Diversion
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference52 articles.
1. X. Guan and N. Yang, “CFD simulation of bubble column hydrodynamics with a novel drag model based on EMMS approach,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 243, 2021, Art. no. 116758, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.116758. 2. J. Chen and C. S. Brooks, “Experiments and CFD simulation of mass transfer and hydrodynamics in a cylindrical bubble column,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 234, 2021, Art. no. 116435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.116435. 3. G. Nadal-Rey, D. D. McClure, J. M. Kavanagh, B. Cassells, S. Cornelissen, D. F. Fletcher, and K. V. Gernaey, “Computational fluid dynamics modelling of hydrodynamics, mixing and oxygen transfer in industrial bioreactors with Newtonian broths,” Biochem. Eng. J., vol. 177, 2022, Art. no. 108265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2021.108265. 4. E. Camarasa, C. Vial, S. Poncin, G. Wild, N. Midoux, and J. Bouillard, “Influence of coalescence behaviour of the liquid and of gas sparging on hydrodynamics and bubble characteristics in a bubble column,” Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 329–344, 1999, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0255-2701(99)00024-0. 5. P. Rollbusch, M. Bothe, M. Becker, M. Ludwig, M. Grünewald, M. Schlüter, and R. Franke, “Bubble columns operated under industrially relevant conditions – Current understanding of design parameters,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 126, pp. 660–678, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.11.061.
|
|