Assessment of Heavy Metals Inactivation in Contaminated Soil by Coal Fly and Bottom Ashes-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessment of Heavy Metals Inactivation in Contaminated Soil by Coal Fly and Bottom Ashes

Published:2017-12-01 Issue:1-4 Volume:48 Page:127-143
ISSN:1899-8526
Container-title:Mineralogia
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Diatta Jean¹,Fojcik Edward²,Drobek Leszek³,Spiżewski Tomasz⁴,Krzesiński Włodzimierz⁴

Affiliation:

1. Poznan University of Life Sciences, Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, ul. Wojska Polskiego, Poznań , Poland

2. SEGO Sp. z o.o., ul. O. Kolberga 65, Rybnik , Poland

3. Central Mining Institute, Department of Environment Monitoring, Plac Gwarków 1, Katowice , Poland

4. Poznan University of Life Science, Department of Vegetable Crops, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań , Poland

Abstract

Abstract The study compared coal fly and bottom ashes for their ability to inactivate metals and lead to soil remediation. Soil was artificially contaminated with Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd at five degrees. Next, both ashes were added at five rates: 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0% and all treatments incubated. Data showed that for moderately contaminated soils, ash rates of 0.5 - 1.0% were efficient from 40 to 70% for Zn and Cd, and raised markedly to between 70 and 93% for Cu and Pb. For extremely contaminated soils, the rates of ashes at 1.0, 1.5 and 2% were much more efficient (60 - 80%). The use of fly and bottom ashes for metal inactivation and soil remediation should give greater consideration to the effect of pH and the type of heavy metals than the content of SiO2and Al2O3. Fly ash displayed superior inactivation and remediation effects to the bottom ash.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology

Reference54 articles.

1. Adriano, D. C., Wenzel, W. W., Vangronsveld, J., & Bolan, N. S. (2004). Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma, 122, 121-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.003.10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.003

2. Antonkiewicz, J. (2007). Influence of different ash-sludge and ash-peat mixtures on the yield and elements content of a grass and birdsfoot trefoil mixted stand. Part II. Heavy metals. Zeszyty Problemów Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 520, 265-278 [in Polish].

3. Bada, S. O., & Potgieter-Vermaak, S. (2008). Evaluation and treatment of coal fly ash for adsorption application. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies, 12, 37-48.

4. Barrow, N. J. (1999). The four laws of soil chemistry: The Lepper lecture 1998. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37, 787-829.

5. Basta, N. T., & McGowen, S. L. (2004). Evaluation of chemical immobilization treatments for reducing heavy metal transport in a smelter-contaminated soil. Environmental Pollution, 127, 3-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0269- 7491(03)00250-1.10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00250-1

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Determination of concentrations of non-volatile elements in fly ash released from coal combustion using EDXRF;International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry;2022-09-07

2. Assessment of the Enrichment of Heavy Metals in Coal and Its Combustion Residues;ACS Omega;2022-06-09

3. Development of Soil Substitutes for the Sustainable Land Reclamation of Coal Mine-Affected Areas;Sustainability;2022-04-12