Affiliation:
1. School of Energy and Power Engineering , Nanjing University of Science and Technology , Nanjing , 210094 , China
Abstract
Abstract
To reveal how aircraft affects the internal flow of the ejector nozzle, we have constructed three model types in this article. These include the model of SR-71 aircraft, the model that only contains ejector nozzle with third auxiliary valve, and the model that integrates the previous two. The results showed that in the transonic regime (M
a = 1.2), the third auxiliary flow mainly stems from the boundary layer of the aircraft body. Indeed, a large-scale flow separation phenomenon near the third auxiliary door may require a more nuanced description. The mainstream flow is always in an overexpansion state and results in a Mach plate structure at the exit of the nozzle. However, after integration, the rates of the third auxiliary and the secondary flow are reduced by 18.15% and 5.26%, respectively. Meanwhile, the mainstream flow demonstrates higher overexpansion levels, the position of the Mach plate further downstream changes, and the thrust coefficient decreases by 1.75%. It is worthwhile noting that a strong pressure gradient occurs in the circumferential direction near the connecting structure, which induces lateral flow. This lateral flow breaks away from the wall under the reverse pressure gradient of the nozzle, thus forming three vortex pairs.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Physics and Astronomy,Mechanics of Materials,Engineering (miscellaneous),Modeling and Simulation,Computational Mechanics,Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Reference21 articles.
1. A. J. Kentfield, “Nozzles for jet-lift V/STOL aircraft,” J. Aircraft, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 283–291, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.43836.
2. M. Takahashi, T. Sunami, H. Tanno, T. Komuro, and K. Itoh, “Performance characteristics of a scramjet engine at Mach 10 to 15 flight condition,” in AIAA 2005-3350, 2005.
3. C. E. Cockrell, A. H. Auslender, R. W. Guy, C. R. Mcclinton, and S. S. Welch, “Technology roadmap for dual-mode scramjet propulsion to support space-access vision vehicle development,” in AIAA, 2002.
4. L. Foster, J. Saunders, B. Sanders, and L. Weir, “Highlights from a Mach 4 experimental demonstration of inlet mode transition for turbine-based combined cycle hypersonic propulsion,” in AIAA, 2012.
5. A. Takakage, T. Hideyuki, and M. Masataka, “The rationale for a hypersonic air-breathing vehicle technology maturization,” in AIAA 2008-2579, 2008.