Affiliation:
1. Department of Anglophone Studies, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 12 , 45141 Essen , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Personal pronouns are vague and highly versatile. In addition to their canonical functions as deictics and anaphors, they can be used to express meanings that go beyond morphosyntactic mapping and feature matching. Potential ambiguity is minimised by a variety of syntactic and extra-syntactic means, including the conversational context. Disambiguation through categorical morphological distinctions is rarely needed. Different non-canonical uses that may theoretically result in ambiguous utterances are presented to illustrate how speakers embrace variable pronoun choice that eludes prescriptive isomorphism, for the sake of expressivity and pragmatic meaning. An ‘Avoid Ambiguity’ principle is suggested for conversation that takes account of the benefits of linguistic variability, vagueness, and the situatedness of natural talk.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference110 articles.
1. Aarts, B., D. Denison, and E. Keizer. 2004. Fuzzy Grammar: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Adger, D., and D. Harbour. 2008. “Why Phi?” In Phi Theory: Phi-Features Across Modules and Interfaces (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics), edited by D. Harbour, D. Adger, and S. Béjar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Anderwald, L., and B. Kortmann. 2013. “Typological Methods in Dialectology.” In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, edited by M. Krug, and J. Schlüter, 313–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Anttila, A., and V. Fong. 2004. “Variation, Ambiguity and Noun Classes in English.” Special Issue Variation in Form Versus Variation in Meaning. Lingua 114 (9–10): 1253–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.06.001.
5. Balhorn, M. 2004. “The Rise of Epicene ‘They’.” Journal of English Linguistics 32 (2): 79–104, https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204265824.