The Method of Belief: The Unity of Kant’s Reflection in the Canon of Pure Reason

Author:

Mileti Nardo Lorenzo1

Affiliation:

1. University of Turin, via Sant'Ottavio 20 , Torino, 10124 , Italy

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this paper is to show the unity and consistency of Kant’s reflections throughout all three sections of the Canon of Pure Reason. More specifically, I argue that Section 3, which is devoted to the issue of Fürwahrhalten, or taking-to-be-true, is crucial to achieving the methodological goal of the Canon, which is to justify the legitimacy of the speculative assumptions of pure reason. After examining the historical roots of Kant’s notion of a transcendental doctrine of method, I focus on the methodological role that the practical element plays in the first two sections of the Canon. I then show how the limitations of Kant’s argument necessitate the introduction of a third crucial section, which serves both an analytic and an orientative function.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Baumgarten, A. G. 1761. Acroasis Logica in Christianum L. B. De Wolff. Halle. Reprinted in Wolff, C. 1973. Gesammelte Werke, edited by J. École, sec. III, Vol. 5. Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: Olms.

2. Birgit, R. 1998. “Der Kanon der reinen Vernunft (A 795/B 823 – A 831/B 859).” In Immanuel Kant. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, edited by G. Mohr, and M. Willaschek, 597–616. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

3. Capozzi, M. 1998. “Le ipotesi nell’epistemologia di Kant.” In Atti del Convegno triennale della Società Italiana di Logica e Filosofia delle Scienze, edited by V. M. Abrusci, C. Cellucci, R. Cordeschi, and V. Fano, 89–102. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.

4. Capozzi, M. 2002. Kant e la logica. Napoli: Bibliopolis.

5. Carboncini, S., and R. Finster. 1982. “Das Begriffspaar Kanon-Organon. Seine Bedeutung für die Entstehung der kritischen Philosophie Kants.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 26 (1): 25–59.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3