Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Theology , Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin , Berlin , 10115, Germany
Abstract
Abstract
In his 1786 essay, What does it mean to orient oneself in thinking?, Kant characterizes the business of reasoning by referring to the use of the spatial orientations ‘right’ and ‘left’; he, then, extents his analysis to mathematical and logical ways of orientation. The following paper will start off by analyzing the Kantian standard account of orientation to, eventually, amend that account by deepening and correcting it in three respects: the indexical character of orientation that is due to the particular standpoint of the subject who is oriented by a particular cluster of available reference points; the twofold comparative procedure of orientation in which a situation is assessed by virtue of a practically justified and indexically structured net of orientation; and the receptive modes of orientation, mirroring the ‘existential’ fact that the subject is already oriented to a situation by established institutions. The paper ends in briefly considering the pitfalls and benefits of being disoriented.
Reference34 articles.
1. Berg, S. 2011. Spielwerk. Orientierungshermeneutische Studien zum Verhältnis von Musik und Religion (RPT 60). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
2. Bernecker, S. 2012. “Kant on Spatial Orientation.” European Journal of Philosophy 24 (4): 519–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2010.00410.x.
3. Black, M. 1970. “Rules and Routines.” In Margins of Precision. Essay in Logic and Language, edited by Idem, 41–56. Ithaca, NY / London: Cornell University Press.
4. Burge, T. 1974. “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy 71 (7): 205–23, https://doi.org/10.2307/2025348.
5. Chignell, A. 2016. “Rational Hope, Moral Order, and the Revolution of the Will.” In Divine Order, Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives, edited by E. Watkins, 197–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.