Affiliation:
1. Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, Università di Pavia , Pavia , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
The article has the aim to show that Kant’s “standard” conception of the highest good does not represent his last word about the problem. Kant moves from a conception of the highest good close connected with the metaphysical tradition and with the aim of a new, moral justification of traditional metahysical concepts such as God and immortality of the soul. This view does find many difficulties and oscillations in the Critiques, looking for different formulations of a moral “proof” for the metaphysical concepts, grounded upon the need of justice and of a rational solution to the question of theodicy. The failure of this project is apparent with the essay on theodicy (1791). In the last decade of Kant’s intellectual activity, the expression “highest good” occurs few times and the concept looses its systematic relevance, as shown by the last works up to the Opus postumum.
Reference26 articles.
1. Adickes, E. 1920. Kants Opus postumum. Berlin: Reuther und Reichard.
2. Cunico, G. 1992. Da Lessing a Kant. La storia in prospettiva escatologica. Genova: Marietti.
3. de Vleeschauwer, H.-J. 1963. “Wie ich jetzt die Kritik der reinen Vernunft entwickungsgeschichtlich lese.” Kant-Studien 54: 351–68, https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1963.54.1-4.351.
4. Fonnesu, L. 2004. “Kants praktische Philosophie und die Verwirklichung der Moral.” In Recht – Geschichte –Religion. Die Bedeutung Kants für die Gegenwart, edited by H. Nagl-Docekal, and R. Langthaler, 49–61. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
5. Fonnesu, L. 2013. “Entwicklung und Erweiterung der praktischen Absicht.” In Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongress, Vol. 3, edited by S. Bacin, A. Ferrarin, C. La Rocca, and M. Ruffing, 173–84. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献