An improved indirect approach for determining reference limits from intra-laboratory data bases exemplified by concentrations of electrolytes / Ein verbesserter indirekter Ansatz zur Bestimmung von Referenzgrenzen mittels intra-laboratorieller Datensätze am Beispiel von Elektrolyt-Konzentrationen

Author:

Arzideh Farhad1,Brandhorst Gunnar2,Gurr Eberhard3,Hinsch Wilhelm4,Hoff Torsten5,Roggenbuck Lennart6,Rothe Gregor7,Schumann Gerhard8,Wolters Bernd9,Wosniok Werner1,Haeckel Rainer7

Affiliation:

1. Institut für Statistik, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany

2. Abteilung für Klinische Chemie, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany

3. Zentrallaboratorium, Klinikum Links-der-Weser, Bremen, Germany

4. Reinhard-Nieter-Krankenhaus, Wilhelmshaven, Germany

5. Zentrallaboratorium, Klinikum Bremen-Nord, Bremen, Germany

6. Zentrallaboratorium, Städtisches Krankenhaus, Kiel, Germany

7. Bremer Zentrum für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany

8. Institut für Klinische Chemie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany

9. Institut für Laboratoriums- und Transfusionsmedizin, Klinikum Bremerhaven, Bremerhaven, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background: The current dogma of establishing intra-laboratory reference limits (RLs) and their periodical reviewing cannot be fulfilled by most laboratories due to the expenses involved. Thus, most laboratories adopt RLs from external sources often neglecting the problems of transferability. Presently accepted validation concepts still require experimental expenses. Several attempts were undertaken to derive RLs from the large data pools stored in modern laboratory information systems. Former indirect procedures were not generally accepted, but were recently further developed and combined with direct exclusion criteria and applied to estimate RLs of the catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes. This approach was now applied to several electrolytes in serum and plasma most commonly applied in clinical chemistry. Methods: A smoothed kernel density function was estimated for the distribution of the mixed data of the sample group (combined data of non-diseased and diseased subjects). It was assumed that the “central” part of the distribution of all data represents the non-diseased (“healthy”) population (non-pathological values) with high probability. The central part was defined by truncation points using an optimisation method, and was used to estimate a Gaussian distribution of the values of non-diseased subjects. This distribution was now considered as the distribution of the non-diseased subgroup. The percentiles of this parametrical distribution were calculated to obtain unimodal reference intervals. Results: The RLs obtained from different laboratories were similar to recently published values established by direct procedures. Stratification for gender was not necessary, but in some cases for age. With rising age, an increase of the upper RL and of the reference range was observed for potassium. Hospitalisation affected the RLs of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium, but not of phosphate. In the case of sodium, the data of at least five regional laboratories could be combined to common RLs. The presented indirect procedure was further validated with a large dataset of potassium concentrations from the NHANES III study with five groups of different health status. Conclusions: The proposed strategy of combining exclusion criteria with an indirect method led to RLs from intra-laboratory data pools for electrolytes which were plausible in comparison to published data obtained by the generally accepted direct approach. The combined concept, however, still requires further investigations. Therefore, it is presently only recommended for checking and reviewing already existing RLs.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Medical Laboratory Technology,Clinical Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3