Non-destructive assay of plutonium in absence of gamma-ray spectrometry
Author:
Chaudhury Sanhita12ORCID, Kumar Ashwani1, Patra Sabyasachi1, Tripathi Rahul12
Affiliation:
1. Radiochemistry Division , Bhabha Atomic Research Centre , Mumbai 400085 , India 2. Chemical Sciences Department , Homi Bhabha National Institute , Mumbai 400094 , India
Abstract
Abstract
Gamma-ray spectrometry-based isotopic composition analysis is a prerequisite for absolute non-destructive assay of Pu by neutron counting or calorimetry. However, gamma-ray spectrometry can be complicated in samples that are heavily shielded or have a high 241Am fraction. Herein, for the absolute non-destructive assay of Pu, a simple yet potent empirical methodology combining neutron multiplicity counting and calorimetry is proposed, which obviates the need for gamma-ray spectrometry-based isotopic composition analysis. The approach includes stepwise correlation between the parameters obtained from neutron multiplicity counting, i.e., α ((α, n) neutron to spontaneous fission neutron ratio), effective mass of 240Pu, and D (doubles neutron rate) with the thermal power output (W
Pu) due to radioactive decay (measured by calorimetry). Because D and W
Pu both are governed by the Pu isotopic composition, their correlation should be sensitive to the isotopic information in a given sample. Mandatory correction for the 241Am contribution in W
Pu was done using the linear plot between its weight fraction and the corresponding α. The proposed methodology was validated by analyzing several PuO2 standards containing high 241Am fraction (0.02–0.09). The measured Pu amounts were within 8 % of the actual values with measurement uncertainties between 8 and 10 %, which shows the potential of the proposed methodology for the assay of samples having high 241Am content or for the quantification of Pu in heavily shielded samples.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference18 articles.
1. Reilly, D., Ensslin, N., Smith, H., Kreiner, S. Passive Nondestructive Assay of Nuclear Materials; Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, 1991. 2. Krachler, M., Wallenius, M., Nicholl, A., Mayer, K. Spatially-resolved uranium isotopic analysis of contaminated scrap metal using laser ablation multi-collector ICP-MS. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 16629–16636; https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra02899a. 3. Straub, M. D., Arnold, J., Fessenden, J., Kiplinger, J. L. Recent advances in nuclear forensic chemistry. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 3–22; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03571. 4. Clapham, M., Farese, N., Jaime, R., Lezzoli, L., Schillebeeckx, P. Performance comparison of different active neutron interrogation techniques for safeguards applications. In Proc. of the 19th ESARDA Symposium on Safeguards and Nuclear Material Management; ESARDA: Montpellier, 1997; pp. 359–367. 5. Ferrer, M. M., Peerani, P., Looman, M. R., Dechamp, L. Design and performances of the scrap neutron multiplicity counter. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2007, 574, 297–314; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.01.167.
|
|