Affiliation:
1. 26595 University of Trier , Department of Economics , Trier , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
We provide evidence for a risk-taking channel of monetary policy transmission in the euro area that works through an increase in shadow banks’ total asset growth and their risk assets ratio. Our dataset covers the period 2000Q1–2018Q3 and includes, in addition to the standard variables for real GDP growth, inflation, and the monetary policy stance, the aforementioned two indicators for the shadow banking sector. Based on vector autoregressive models for the euro area as a whole, we find a portfolio reallocation effect towards riskier assets and evidence for a general expansion of assets. Both effects last for roughly six quarters in the case of conventional monetary policy shocks, whereas for unconventional monetary policy shocks the responses are significant for two quarters only. Country-specific as well as sector-specific estimations confirm these findings for most of the euro area countries and all non-bank types, but also reveal some heterogeneity in the reaction of financial institutions.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference67 articles.
1. Adrian, T., and A. B. Ashcraft. 2012. “Shadow Banking Regulation.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 559.
2. Adrian, T., and H. S. Shin. 2011. “Financial Intermediaries and Monetary Economics.” In Handbook of Monetary Economics, edited by B. M. Friedman and M. Woodford, 601–650. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Altunbas, Y., L. Gambacorta, and D. Marques-Ibanez. 2014. “Does Monetary Policy Affect Bank Risk?” International Journal of Central Banking 10(1): 95–136.
4. Angeloni, I., and E. Faia. 2013. “Capital Regulation and Monetary Policy with Fragile Banks.” Journal of Monetary Economics 60(3): 311–324.
5. Angeloni, I., E. Faia, and M. Lo Duca. 2015. “Monetary Policy and Risk Taking.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 52:285–307.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献