The impact of right ventricular hemodynamics on the performance of a left ventricular assist device in a numerical simulation model
Author:
Thut Titus L. Z.1, Petrou Anastasios2, Meboldt Mirko2, Daners Marianne Schmid2, Wilhelm Markus J.1
Affiliation:
1. Clinic for Cardiac Surgery , University Hospital Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland 2. Product Development Group Zurich, Department for Mechanical and Process Engineering , ETH Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been established as alternative to heart transplantation for patients with end-stage heart failure refractory to medical therapy. Right heart failure (RHF) after LVAD implantation is associated with inferior outcome. Its preoperative anticipation may influence the selection between a pure left ventricular and a biventricular device type and, thus, improve outcomes. Reliable algorithms to predict RHF are missing.
Methods
A numerical model was used for simulation of a cardiovascular circulation. The LVAD was placed as parallel circuit between left ventricle and aorta. In contrast to other studies, the dynamic hydraulic behavior of a pulsatile LVAD was replaced by that of a continuous LVAD. A variety of hemodynamic states was tested mimicking different right heart conditions. Adjustable parameters included heart rate (HR), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), tricuspid regurgitation (TR), right ventricular contractility (RVC) and pump speed. Outcome parameters comprised central venous pressure (CVP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), cardiac output (CO) and occurrence of suction.
Results
Alteration of HR, PVR, TR, RVC and pump speed resulted in diverse effects on CO, CVP and mPAP, resulting in improvement, impairment or no change of the circulation, depending on the degree of alteration.
Conclusions
The numerical simulation model allows prediction of circulatory changes and LVAD behaviour following variation of hemodynamic parameters. Such a prediction may be of particular advantage to anticipate RHF after LVAD implantation. It may help preoperatively to choose the appropriate strategy of only left ventricular or both left and right ventricular support.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biomedical Engineering
Reference28 articles.
1. Feldman, D, Pamboukian, SV, Teuteberg, JJ, Birks, E, Lietz, K, Moore, SA, et al.. The 2013 international society for heart and lung transplantation guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013;32:157–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2012.09.013. 2. Ponikowski, P, Voors, AA, Anker, SD, Bueno, H, Cleland, JGF, Coats, AJS, et al.. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:891–975. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. 3. Wilhelm, MJ, Ruschitzka, F, Falk, V. Destination therapy – time for a paradigm change in heart failure therapy. Swiss Med Wkly 2013;143:w13729. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2013.13729. 4. Kormos, RL, Cowger, J, Pagani, FD, Teuteberg, JJ, Goldstein, DJ, Jacobs, JP, et al.. The society of thoracic surgeons intermacs database annual report: evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019;38:114–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013. 5. Reesink, K, Dekker, A, Van der Nagel, T, Beghi, C, Leonardi, F, Botti, P, et al.. Suction due to left ventricular assist: implications for device control and management. Artif Organs 2007;31:542–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00420.x.
|
|