Diagnostic and prognostic implications of bacteremia in patients with complicated pleural infection
Author:
Kim Chang Ho1, Park Ji Eun1, Cha Jung Guen2, Lim Jae Kwang2, Park Jongmin2, Lee Yong Hoon1, Choi Sun Ha1, Seo Hyewon1, Yoo Seung Soo1, Lee Shin Yup1, Cha Seung Ick1, Park Jae Yong1, Lee Jaehee1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine , 65672 Kyungpook National University , Daegu , Republic of Korea 2. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine , 65672 Kyungpook National University , Daegu , Republic of Korea
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The clinical significance of bacteremia in patients with complicated pleural infection is still uncertain. We aimed to examine the incidence and clinical significance of bacteremia in patients with complicated pleural infection.
Methods
This retrospective study comprised of consecutive patients who received pleural drainage due to complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema. The clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data and clinical outcome were compared between patients with and without bacteremia. Additionally, the factors associated with overall mortality were evaluated in these patients.
Results
Of 341 patients included in the analysis, 25 (7 %) had a positive blood culture. Blood culture testing added 2 % identification of causative pathogen compared to pleural fluid culture alone. By multivariable analysis, radiologic features of cavitary lesion, a RAPID score≥5, and a positive microbial culture in pleural fluid were independently associated with bacteremia. Despite these clinical distinctions, there was ultimately no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between patients with and without bacteremia (3 vs. 4 %, p=1.0). The only factor significantly associated with overall mortality among patients with complicated pleural infections was a higher RAPID score [HR=1.96 (95 % CI=1.35–2.84)].
Conclusions
The rate of bacteremia in patients with complicated pleural infection was 7 %. Blood culture testing demonstrated limited diagnostic yield and had minimal impact on clinical outcomes compared to pleural fluid culture. Therefore, it seems that blood culture testing is more advantageous for specific patients with suspected pleural infection who have cavitary lesions or a RAPID score≥5.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference29 articles.
1. Corcoran, JP, Wrightson, JM, Belcher, E, DeCamp, MM, Feller-Kopman, D, Rahman, NM. Pleural infection: past, present, and future directions. Lancet Respir Med 2015;3:563–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00185-x. 2. Maskell, NA, Davies, CW, Nunn, AJ, Hedley, EL, Gleeson, FV, Miller, R, et al.. U.K. Controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2005;352:865–74. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa042473. 3. Rahman, NM, Maskell, NA, West, A, Teoh, R, Arnold, A, Mackinlay, C, et al.. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2011;365:518–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1012740. 4. Lisboa, T, Waterer, GW, Lee, YC. Pleural infection: changing bacteriology and its implications. Respirology 2011;16:598–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01964.x. 5. White, HD, White, BA, Song, J, Fader, R, Quiroga, P, Arroliga, AC. Pleural infections: a 9-year review of bacteriology, case characteristics and mortality. Am J Med Sci 2013;345:349–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/maj.0b013e318259bd24.
|
|