Outcomes after curatively intended treatment of limited peritoneal metastases and thermal ablation for liver metastases from colorectal cancer
Author:
Balachandran Rogini12ORCID, Sørensen Mette Møller1, Funder Jonas Amstrup1, Knudsen Anders Riegels1, Iversen Lene Hjerrild12
Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark 2. Department of Clinical Medicine , Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Peritoneal metastases (PM) and liver metastases (LM) are present simultaneously in up to 2 % of patients at the time of their colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. Curatively intended treatment includes cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with LM resection. A less invasive treatment for LM is ablation. We aimed to estimate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and postoperative data in patients managed simultaneously with CRS, HIPEC and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as first choice.
Methods
This was a retrospective national cohort study. All patients were treated at Aarhus University Hospital; the only CRS+HIPEC centre in Denmark. We included CRC patients managed with curative intent for simultaneously diagnosed PM and LM in the period January 2016 – December 2021. LM was treated with RFA as first choice, if possible. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
A total of 25 patients were included, the median age was 60 years (range 43–75 years) and 15 (60 %) were females. The median peritoneal cancer index was 7 (range 0–12), the median number of LM was 1 (range 1–3). Ablation was performed as the only treatment for LM in 18 (72 %) patients. After a median follow-up time of 17.1 months (range 4–36 months), the median OS was 28.6 months (95 % confidence interval (Cl) 15.8;36.1), 1-year OS was 84.0 % (95 % Cl 62.8;93.7). Median DFS was 6.1 months (95 % Cl 4.0;10.3). Median LOS was ten days (range 5–26 days). Both 30-day and 90-day mortality were 0 %.
Conclusions
The selected treatment modality (RFA) for CRC patients with both LM and PM was safe. However, DFS was low. Further research is warranted to investigate if RFA is as effective as LM resection.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference41 articles.
1. van der Geest, LG, Lam-Boer, J, Koopman, M, Verhoef, C, Elferink, MA, de Wilt, JH. Nationwide trends in incidence, treatment and survival of colorectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 2015;32:457–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-015-9719-0. 2. Jayne, DG, Fook, S, Loi, C, Seow-Choen, F. Peritoneal carcinoma-tosis from colorectal cancer. Brit J Surg 2002;89:1545–50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02274.x. 3. Ravn, S, Christiansen, CF, Hagemann-Madsen, RH, Verwaal, VJ, Iversen, LH. The validity of registered synchronous peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer in the Danish medical registries. Clin Epidemiol 2020;12:333–43. https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s238193. 4. Engstrand, J, Nilsson, H, Stromberg, C, Jonas, E, Freedman, J. Colorectal cancer liver metastases – a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer 2018;18:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3925-x. 5. Narasimhan, V, Tan, S, Kong, J, Pham, T, Michael, M, Ramsay, R, et al.. Prognostic factors influencing survival in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for isolated colorectal peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2020;22:1482–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15003.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|