Influence mechanisms of 2-amino-1,3,5-triazine-4,6-dithiol coating on adhesion properties of polybutylene terephthalate/aluminum interface in nano-injection molding
Author:
Zeng Pan1, Liu Donglei1, Luo Xin1, Zhan Kai1, Yuan Tian1
Affiliation:
1. School of Advanced Manufacturing, Nanchang University , No. 999, Xuefu Road , NanChang , Jiangxi 330031 , P. R. China
Abstract
Abstract
Four interfacial models, including the PBT-Al&P (Plane), PBT-Al&V (V-slot), PBT-ATD-Al&P (Plane), and PBT-ATD-Al&V (V-slot), were constructed. The molecular dynamics (MD) method was launched to study the interfacial interactions and bonding behaviors between heterogeneous interfaces in nano-injection molding. The influence mechanism of the 2-amino-1,3,5-triazine-4,6-dithiol (ATD) coating on adhesion properties of the PBT–Al interface was mainly explored. Results indicated that the nano-V-slot interface system exhibited a double-wall-slipping phenomenon, unlike the non-nano-interface (macroscale molding) one. In nano-V-slot interfacial models, although the ATD coating reduced the double-wall-slipping velocity, it also increased the polar bonding, thus strengthened a better anchoring connection in the PBT–ATD–Al interface. The addition of the ATD layer did not cause chemical bonding of the original PBT materials; the interlocking effect behavior occurred between them and only coexisted in the form of physical anchors. Whatever model it was, the ATD layer interface had significantly higher interface energy than the other one, which was formed solely by PBT and Al substrate. In nano-injection molding, when the ATD intermediate layer was added, the bonding behavior of the PBT–Al interface also changed from simple nonbonded rigid anchoring to the entanglement anchor between the PBT–ATD macrochains and the nonbonding connections between ATD-Al interfaces.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,General Chemical Engineering
Reference48 articles.
1. Grujicic, M., Sellappan, V., Omar, M. A., Seyr, N., Obieglo, A., Erdmann, M., Holzleitner, J. An overview of the polymer-to-metal direct-adhesion hybrid technologies for load-bearing automotive components. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2008, 197, 363–373. 2. Ramani, K., Moriarty, B. Thermoplastic bonding to metals via injection molding for macro-composite manufacture. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1998, 38, 870–877. 3. Schroers, J., Hodges, T. M., Kumar, G., Raman, H., Barnes, A. J., Pham, Q., Waniuk, T. A. Thermoplastic blow molding of metals. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 14–19. 4. Zink, B., Szabo, F., Hatos, I., Suplicz, A., Kovacs, N. K., Hargitai, H., Tabi, T., Kovacs, J. G. Enhanced injection molding simulation of advanced injection molds. Polymers-Basel 2017, 9, 77. 5. Zhang, N., Byrne, C. J., Browne, D. J., Gilchrist, M. D. Towards nano-injection molding. Mater. Today 2012, 15, 216–221.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|