Affiliation:
1. University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK
Abstract
Abstract
The university lecture has attracted much critical evaluation over a long period. Yet it remains resilient in the face of such scepticism. However, the project reported here finds that a sample of experienced lecturers fail to recognise the terms of this critique in their own practice. They uniformly describe contrary approaches. These are characterised in terms of three communication priorities: orchestration, enactment, and dialogue. An emphasis on the dialogic nature of exposition suggested an exploratory intervention in which students collaborated with a peer around a recorded lecture. Transcripts of these sessions indicate the way in which lectures can prompt a ‘conversational’ reaction within their audiences. The overall pattern of findings reported here helps to interpret the resilience of the live lecture. The success of online courses implies that lecturing co-presence is central to the resilience of lecturing in mainstream education. This is interpreted in relation to practitioners’ continued protection of three imperatives within live exposition: community, conviviality and conversation.
Reference57 articles.
1. Adams, C. (2006). PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600579141.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change: A call to action, final report. Washington, DC: AAAS. http://visionandchange.org/finalreport.
3. Auria, C. P. (2006). Signalling speaker’s intentions: Towards a phraseology of textual metadiscourse in academic lecturing. English as a Glocalization Phenomenon. Observations from a Linguistic Microcosm, 3, 59.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1979/2010). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/720466.
5. Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Open University Press.