Locating the university lecture as a contemporary educational practice

Author:

Crook Charles1

Affiliation:

1. University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK

Abstract

Abstract The university lecture has attracted much critical evaluation over a long period. Yet it remains resilient in the face of such scepticism. However, the project reported here finds that a sample of experienced lecturers fail to recognise the terms of this critique in their own practice. They uniformly describe contrary approaches. These are characterised in terms of three communication priorities: orchestration, enactment, and dialogue. An emphasis on the dialogic nature of exposition suggested an exploratory intervention in which students collaborated with a peer around a recorded lecture. Transcripts of these sessions indicate the way in which lectures can prompt a ‘conversational’ reaction within their audiences. The overall pattern of findings reported here helps to interpret the resilience of the live lecture. The success of online courses implies that lecturing co-presence is central to the resilience of lecturing in mainstream education. This is interpreted in relation to practitioners’ continued protection of three imperatives within live exposition: community, conviviality and conversation.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference57 articles.

1. Adams, C. (2006). PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600579141.

2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change: A call to action, final report. Washington, DC: AAAS. http://visionandchange.org/finalreport.

3. Auria, C. P. (2006). Signalling speaker’s intentions: Towards a phraseology of textual metadiscourse in academic lecturing. English as a Glocalization Phenomenon. Observations from a Linguistic Microcosm, 3, 59.

4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1979/2010). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/720466.

5. Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Open University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3