The State of the UBI Debate: Mapping the Arguments for and against UBI

Author:

Afscharian Dominic1ORCID,Muliavka Viktoriia2ORCID,Ostrowski Marius S.3ORCID,Siegel Lukáš4

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Political Science , University of Tübingen , Tuebingen , Baden-Württemberg , Germany

2. Graduate School for Social Research , Polish Academy of Sciences , 00-901 , Warszawa , Poland

3. European University Institute , Fiesole , Toscana , Italy

4. Bratislava International School of Liberal Arts , Bratislava , Slovakia

Abstract

Abstract This article provides a map of the UBI debate, structured into the main themes that guide and group the arguments on both sides. It finds that UBI’s supporters and opponents both draw on core principles of justice and freedom, focusing on need and poverty, discrimination and inequality, growth, social opportunity, individuality, and self-development. From an economic perspective, they both appeal to business concerns about efficiency, risk, flexibility, and consumption, as well as labour interests on work fulfilment, working conditions, remuneration, and bargaining. Likewise, they focus on political questions around welfare state reforms, redistribution, taxation and funding sources, democratic citizenship, and the prospects for cross-party policy coalitions. By providing an overview of the thematic pillars of the UBI debate, this article helps researchers and activists locate and orient themselves within the wider spectrum of opinion on UBI.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference153 articles.

1. Abrahamian, A. A. (2018). Money for nothing. https://newrepublic.com/article/150506/universal-basic-income-future-of-pointless-work [Accessed 08 Dec 2020].

2. Afscharian, D., Muliavka, V., Ostrowski, M. S., & Siegel, L. (2021). The European Basic Income - Delivering on Social Europe. Brussels: Foundation of European Progressive Studies. https://feps-europe.eu/publication/833-european-basic-income/ [Accessed 09 Jun 2022].

3. Arthur, D. (2016). Basic income: A radical idea enters the mainstream. Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliamentary Library.

4. Bakija, J. M., & Slemrod, J. (2004). Do the rich flee from high state taxes? Evidence from federal estate tax returns. National Bureau of Economic Research.

5. Banerjee, A., Niehaus, P., & Suri, T. (2019). Universal basic income in the developing world. Annual Review of Economics, 11, 959–983. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030229.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3