Affiliation:
1. Profesor de Lingüística y Filología Españolas, Departamento de Español, Italiano y Portugués , 444 New Cabell Hall , Universidad de Virginia , Charlottesville, VA 22903, EE.UU. United States of America
Abstract
Abstract
The origin of –y of Sp. soy, doy, voy, estoy remains unresolved to date. The present study reconsiders and elaborates the ‘post-verbal yo hypothesis’, originally proposed by Ford (1911), which has been rejected by most scholars because they have misunderstood it to suggest that the post-verbal subject pronoun yo became atonic and agglutinated to the verb, subsequently reducing to –y. It is suggested here that the phenomenon of ‘leftward palatal spreading’ from the post-verbal subject pronoun yo, with no agglutination nor reduction in form, first produced phonetic variants, e.g., so yo > ['soi̯-'yo], which were later morphologized and raised to allomorphic status before becoming full-fledged morphological variants upon extraction from the new syntagms, e.g., soy yo > soy (yo) > soy.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference30 articles.
1. ADMYTE vols 0 & 1 (1992-): = Archivo digital de manuscritos y textos españoles, Madrid: Micronet.
2. Baist, Gottfried (1888): “Die spanische Sprache”, Grundriss der romanische Philologie 1, pp. 689–714.
3. Baist, Gottfried (1892): “Soy”, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 16, p. 532.
4. Barrutia, Richard/Schwegler, Armin (1994): Fonética y fonología españolas: teoría y práctica, New York: Wiley.
5. CORDE = Real Academia Española (ed.), Corpus diacrónico del español (CORDE): [en línea: http://corpus.rae.es/cordenet.html, 4/30/2020].