Affiliation:
1. CLiPS, University of Antwerp , Antwerpen , Belgium
2. QLVL, University of Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
The research paradigm of alternation studies is forming an increasingly large share of the empirical foundations of usage-based linguistics. As the paradigm is essentially an amalgamation of research traditions from various subfields of linguistics, including sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, cognitive linguistics, and construction grammar, it sports various definitions of the concept of “alternation” and various ways of conducting an alternation study, which are not always compatible. The present special issue is therefore intended to bring researchers from various backgrounds in usage-based linguistics together to see how we can deal with these issues. This introduction first presents the various ways of defining an alternation and discusses the differences between them and how these definitions determine the methodological set-up of an alternation study. Next, the contributions to the special issue are each in turn summarized and related to one another.
Reference51 articles.
1. Aaron, Jessi. 2010. Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context. Language Variation and Change 3. 191–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394509990226.
2. Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert & Arne Zeschel. 2010. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0001.
3. Bloem, Jelke, Arjen Versloot & Fred Weerman. 2015. An agent-based model of a historical word order change. In Robert Berwick, Anna Korhonen, Alessandro Lenci, Thierry Poibeau & Aline Villavicencio (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning, 22–27. Lisbon: Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Bresnan, Joan, Cueni Anna, Tatiana Nikitina & Rolf Harald Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Gerolf Bouma, Irene Krämer & Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.
5. Brook, Marisa. 2018. Taking it up a level: Copy-raising and cascaded tiers of morphosyntactic change. Language Variation and Change 30. 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394518000078.