Affiliation:
1. Department of English Language and Literature , School of Foreign Languages, The University of Jordan , Amman , Jordan
2. Applied Science University , Amman , Jordan
Abstract
Abstract
This article investigates the morphosyntactic behavior of the diminutive morpheme -aaj in three Arabic dialects (Egyptian Arabic, Syrian Arabic, and Jordanian Arabic). It argues that this morpheme is categorially a head that projects Size Phrase (cf. De Belder, Marijke. 2008. Size matters: Towards a syntactic decomposition of countability. In Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 116–122. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project). In so doing, this analysis obviously challenges (Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 2018. Constructing feminine to mean: Gender, number, numeral, and quantifier extensions in Arabic. Lanham: Lexington Books) recent proposal that (non-)concatenative diminutives in Arabic are modifiers that are adjoined to categorized words when they indicate smallness in size. Additionally, this article provides an account of the observation that the diminutive morpheme -aaj can only appear with the feminine ending and a certain group of nouns, including collective aggregates (e.g., fruits and vegetables) and granular aggregates (e.g., grains, nuts, and seeds). We show that words suffixed with the diminutive morpheme -aaj can only give rise to an individuation reading (not a partition or non-count reading). This is syntactically interpreted as indicating that Size Phrase (headed by -aaj) is always dominated in Arabic grammar by Division Phrase (cf. Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press), whose presence derives an individuation reading.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference28 articles.
1. Alshammari, Wafi & Stuart Davis. 2019. Diminutive and augmentative formation in northern Najdi/Hā’ili Arabic. In Amel Khalfaoui & Youssef A. Haddad (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXI: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, Norman, Oklahoma, 2017, 51–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Bachrach, Asaf & Michael Wagner. 2007. Syntactically driven cyclicity vs. output-output correspondence: The case of adjunction in diminutive morphology. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 1–16.
3. Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 35–71.
4. Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献