Affiliation:
1. Department of Linguistics , University of California Santa Cruz , 1156 High Street , Santa Cruz, CA 95064 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Much recent work on the syntax-prosody interface has been based in Optimality Theory. The typical analysis explicitly considers only a small number of candidates that could reasonably be expected to be optimal under some ranking, often without an explicit definition of GEN. Manually generating all the possible candidates, however, is prohibitively time-consuming for most input structures – the Too Many Candidates Problem. Existing software for OT uses regular expressions for automated generation and evaluation of candidates. However, regular expressions are too low in the Chomsky Hierarchy of language types to represent trees of arbitrary size, which are needed for syntax-prosody work. This paper presents a new computational tool for research in this area: Syntax-Prosody in Optimality Theory (SPOT). For a given input, SPOT generates all prosodic parses under certain assumptions about GEN, and evaluates them against all constraints in CON. This allows for in-depth comparison of the typological predictions made by different theories of GEN and CON at the syntax-prosody interface.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference44 articles.
1. Agbayani, Brian, Chris Golston & Dasha Henderer. 2011. Prosodic movement. In Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 231–239. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
2. Agbayani, Brian, Chris Golston & Toru Ishii. 2015. Syntactic and prosodic scrambling in Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(1). 47–77.
3. Bane, Max & Jason Riggle. 2010. PYPHON 1.0. Software package. http://code.google.com/p/clml/.
4. Bane, Max & Jason Riggle. 2012. Consequences of candidate omission. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 695–706.
5. Bellik, Jennifer & Nick Kalivoda. 2016. Adjunction and branchingness effects in syntax-prosody mapping. In Gunnar Ólafur Hansson, Ashley Farris-Trimble, Kevin McMullin & Douglas Pulleyblank (eds.), Supplemental proceedings of the 2015 Annual Meeting on Phonology Article 2, 1–11. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Match Theory: An overview;Language and Linguistics Compass;2022-01