Affiliation:
1. University of Minnesota Duluth , Duluth , MN , USA
Abstract
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the Korean internally headed relative clause (IHRC) construction from a Cognitive Grammar perspective. The primary issue concerning the Korean IHRC construction is the mismatch between the syntactic object and the semantic head. While the whole embedded clause headed by kes functions as a grammatical object, the semantic head may acquire the object status. I demonstrate that the mismatch is nothing but a metonymic process, just like the mismatch we observe in the loon in the water; even when only the loon’s feet are in the water, the expression is felicitously understood without identifying the particular portion of the loon under water. Just like the speaker accesses the loon’s feet through the loon, she accesses the semantic head through the reified embedded clause in the IHRC construction. I show that adopting this general human cognitive process helps us reach a broader generalization and sheds new light on hitherto neglected examples.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference40 articles.
1. Barcelona, Antonio. 2011. Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view, 7–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Helene N. Andreassen, Lauren Gawne, Gary Holton, Susan Smythe Kung, Pulsifer Peter, Lauren B. Collister, The Data Citation and Attribution in Linguistics Group & The Linguistics Data Interest Group. 2018. The Austin principles of data citation in linguistics. Version 1.0. https://site.uit.no/linguisticsdatacitation/austinprinciples/ (accessed 7 June 2021).
3. Chung, Chan & Jong-Bok Kim. 2003. Differences between externally and internally headed relative clause construction. In Jong-Bok Kim & Stephen Wechsler (eds.), The proceedings of the 9th international conference on HPSG, 43–65. Stanford: CSLI.
4. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2020. The syntax of relative clauses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Croft, William. 1993. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4(4). 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.4.335.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献