Affiliation:
1. CLPS , Brown University , 190 Thayer St , Providence, RI 02912 , USA
2. Brain and Cognitive Sciences , University of Rochester , Rochester, NY , USA
Abstract
Abstract
It has long been noted that language production seems to reflect a correlation between message redundancy and signal reduction. More frequent words and contextually predictable instances of words, for example, tend to be produced with shorter and less clear signals. The same tendency is observed in the language code (e.g. the phonological lexicon), where more frequent words and words that are typically contextually predictable tend to have fewer segments or syllables. Average predictability in context (informativity) also seems to be an important factor in understanding phonological alternations. What has received little attention so far is the relation between various information-theoretic indices – such as frequency, contextual predictability, and informativity. Although each of these indices has been associated with different theories about the source of the redundancy-reduction link, different indices tend to be highly correlated in natural language, making it difficult to tease apart their effects. We present a computational approach to this problem. We assess the correlations between frequency, predictability, and informativity, and assess when these correlations are likely to create spurious (null or non-null) effects depending on, for example, the amount of data available to the researcher.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference56 articles.
1. Al-Nassir, A. A. 1993. Sibawayh the phonologist: A critical study of the phonetic and phonological theory of Sibawayh as presented in his treatise Al-Kitab. London [u.a.]: Kegan Paul Internat.
2. Arnold, J. E., J. M. Kahn & G. C. Pancani. 2012. Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 19(3). 505–512.
3. Aylett, M. & A. Turk. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31–56.
4. Aylett, M. & A. Turk. 2006. Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Acoustical Society of America Journal 119. 3048–3058.
5. Bates, E. & B. MacWhinney. 1987. Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 157–194. Hillsdale/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献