Complexity in sign languages

Author:

Malaia Evie A.1ORCID,Borneman Joshua D.2,Kurtoglu Emre3,Gurbuz Sevgi Z.3,Griffin Darrin4,Crawford Chris5,Gurbuz Ali C.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Communication Disorders , The University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , AL , USA

2. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA

3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering , The University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , AL , USA

4. Department of Communication Studies , The University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , AL , USA

5. Department of Computer Science , The University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , AL , USA

6. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering , Mississippi State University , Starkville , MS , USA

Abstract

Abstract Sign languages are human communication systems that are equivalent to spoken language in their capacity for information transfer, but which use a dynamic visual signal for communication. Thus, linguistic metrics of complexity, which are typically developed for linear, symbolic linguistic representation (such as written forms of spoken languages) do not translate easily into sign language analysis. A comparison of physical signal metrics, on the other hand, is complicated by the higher dimensionality (spatial and temporal) of the sign language signal as compared to a speech signal (solely temporal). Here, we review a variety of approaches to operationalizing sign language complexity based on linguistic and physical data, and identify the approaches that allow for high fidelity modeling of the data in the visual domain, while capturing linguistically-relevant features of the sign language signal.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference50 articles.

1. Altmann, Gabriel. 1980. Prolegomena to Menzerath’s law. Glottometrika 2(2). 1–10.

2. Altmann, Gabriel & Michael H. Schwibbe. 1989. Das menzerathsche gesetz in informationsverarbeitenden systemen. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.

3. Andres, Jan, Jiřı Langer & Vladimır Matlach. 2020. Fractal–based analysis of sign language. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 84. 105214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105214.

4. Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical borrowing in American sign language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.

5. Bellugi, Ursula & Susan Fischer. 1972. A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition 1(2–3). 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90018-2.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3