The relationship between required physician letters of recommendation and decreasing diversity in osteopathic medical school admissions

Author:

Fox Justin1,Burgess John1,Stoner Alexis M.1,Garner Harold1,Bendyk Heather1

Affiliation:

1. Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Carolinas Campus , Spartanburg , SC , USA

Abstract

Abstract Context Some racial and ethnic groups are underrepresented in the medical field because they face unique barriers to admission to medical school. One admission requirement that can present a barrier for applicants is the physician letter of recommendation (PLOR). Undergraduate students report confusion with the application process and lack of mentorship to be two of their biggest challenges to becoming a doctor. It is especially challenging to those who already have limited access to practicing physicians. Therefore, we hypothesized that in the presence of a PLOR requirement, the diversity of students who apply and matriculate into medical school will be decreased. Objectives This study aims to determine if a relationship exists between a PLOR requirement for the medical school application and the proportion of underrepresented in medicine (URM) students applying and matriculating to that school. Methods A retrospective study was conducted utilizing data published by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine Application Services (AACOMAS) on the race and ethnicity of applicants and matriculants to osteopathic medical schools during the years 2009–2019. In total, 35 osteopathic schools with 44 campuses were included in the study. Schools were grouped based on whether they required a PLOR. For each group of schools, descriptive statistics were performed for the following variables: number of total applicants, class size, application rate per ethnicity, matriculation rate per ethnicity, number of applicants per ethnicity, number of matriculants per ethnicity, and percentage of student body per ethnicity. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was utilized to detect differences between the two groups. Statistical significance was assessed at the α=0.05 level. Results Schools that required a PLOR showed decreases in the number of applicants across all races and ethnicities. Black students showed the greatest difference between groups and were the only ethnicity to show significant reductions across all outcomes in the presence of a PLOR requirement. On average, schools that required a PLOR have 37.3% (185 vs. 295; p<0.0001) fewer Black applicants and 51.2% (4 vs. 8.2; p<0.0001) fewer Black matriculants. Conclusions This study strongly suggests a relationship between requiring a PLOR’s and decreasing racial and ethnic diversity in medical school matriculants, specifically the Black applicants. Based on this result, it is recommended that the requirement of a PLOR be discontinued for osteopathic medical schools.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine,Complementary and Manual Therapy

Reference33 articles.

1. AAMC. Underrepresented in medicine definition. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/equity-diversity-inclusion/underrepresented-in-medicine [Accessed 2 Dec 2021].

2. Lett, E, Murdock, HM, WU, O, Aysola, J, Sebro, R. Trends in racial/ethnic representation among US medical students. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1910490. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490.

3. U.S. Census Bureau Quickfacts: United States. Available from: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219 [Accessed 2 Dec 2021].

4. AACOM Reports on Matriculants. Applicants & matriculants by race and ethnicity by COM. Available from: https://www.aacom.org/reports-programs-initiatives/aacom-reports/matriculants [Accessed 2 Dec 2021].

5. Cohen, JJ. The consequences of premature abandonment of affirmative action in medical school admissions. JAMA 2003;289:1143–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.9.1143.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3