Meaning and the evolution of signification and objectivity

Author:

Pharoah Mark1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Independent Scholar , London , UK

Abstract

Abstract The coevolution of objectivity and subjectivity and the nature of both their division and connection are central to this paper. Section 2 addresses the nature of meaning from the subjective perspective. Initially, I examine the meaningful engagement that exists between the unicellular organism and its environment. In this respect, I focus on the ontological importance of the qualitative biochemical assimilation of the physical rather than on the evolution of form and function. In Section 3, I broaden the discussion to include multicellular organisms and introduce the idea that meaning, at various levels, qualifies different objective and informational constructs of the world. These determine the character of interactive engagement and reveal much about the way in which an agent signifies the external. In Section 4, I review Darwinian evolution from the position of the existential self. I emphasize that meaning is that which qualifies the human concept of objectivity, rather than that objectivity is that which will help humankind qualify or understand meaning. Ultimately, this outlook challenges scientific disciplines that have tended to obscure the relevance of meaning and sought, instead, to explain it from an epistemological footing. In its overall scope, I try to establish the view that the subjective and objective domains are more nuanced, layered, and intertwined ontologically than the default stance that presents a binary juxtaposition between the two.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference40 articles.

1. Alexander, Victoria N. 2014. Introduction: Toward a definition of biosemiosic chance. Biosemiotics 7. 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9207-y.

2. Boholm, Max. 2016. Towards a semiotic definition of discourse and a basis for a typology of discourses. Semiotica 208(1/4). 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0112.

3. Bradbury, Ray. 1952. A sound of thunder. In R is for rocket. New York: Doubleday.

4. Cassirer, Ernst. 1985. The phenomenology of knowledge (The philosophy of symbolic forms 3). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

5. Chalmers, David. 1995. Facing up to the hard problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3). 200–219.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3