Affiliation:
1. Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Department of Sport and Health Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
. The purpose of this article is first to provide a picture of disability sport in general and second to increase knowledge of sport for women with disabilities.
Material and methods
. The study method is a qualitative text analysis of organised Swedish disability sport and of media reporting of the Paralympics. The study begins in 1969, the year when the Swedish Sports Organization for the Disabled (SHIF) was formed, and continues until the Summer Paralympics in 2012. The theory is based on three conceptual pairs: integration and inclusion, the medical and social models, and the traditional and progressive models of media coverage.
Results
. The results show that SHIF strove principally not for inclusion but for integration. Further, women in SHIF led a hidden existence, except for the period between the end of the 1970s and the beginning of the 1980s, when initiatives were taken to improve their position. In other respects, this was a non-issue. Moreover, the medical model was dominant, and sport was viewed above all as rehabilitating. Finally, mainstream media reporting was traditional, namely Paralympic participants were portrayed first and foremost as people with disabilities and secondarily as sports practitioners.
Conclusion
. Swedish disability sport during this period was not included in the sports movement in general and integration work was, for the SHIF board, superordinate to the gender aspect.
Subject
Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference50 articles.
1. 1. DePauw K., Gavron S. (2005). Disability sport. Second Edition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
2. 2. Bailey S. (2008). Athlete first: A history of the Paralympic Movement. London: Wiley and Sons.
3. 3. DePauw K. (1986). Horseback riding for individuals with disabilities: Programs, philosophy and research. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 3, 217-226.10.1123/apaq.3.3.217
4. 4. De Pauw K. (2001). The Paralympic Movement: Past, present and future. ICHPER-SD Journal 2, 42-47.
5. 5. Carlsson B., Lindfelt M. (2010). Legal and moral pluralism: Normative tensions in a Nordic sports model in transition. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics 13, 718-733.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献