Therapy-as-Theatre: Porosity and Circulations of Feeling in Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s An Octoroon (2014) and Duncan Macmillan’s Every Brilliant Thing (2013)

Author:

Busch Sarah1,Liedke Heidi Lucja2

Affiliation:

1. Department of English I , University of Cologne , Albertus-Magnus-Platz 1, 50923 Cologne , Germany

2. Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of English and American Studies , Norbert-Wollheim-Platz 1, 60323 Frankfurt , Germany

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how theatre works as a form of therapy using Duncan Macmillan’s Every Brilliant Thing and Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s An Octoroon. Both depict fictional representations of psychotherapy but also use concepts from narrative therapy as developed by White and Epston (1990), such as the audience as witnesses and creators of their own story. We argue that therapy-as-theatre exerts a pull on the audience, which invites them to empathize, identify and understand, and draws them into the “affective arrangement” of the plays as defined by Slaby, Mühlhoff, and Wüschner (2019). The two plays bring together the therapeutic and the theatrical both in terms of content and form: in Every Brilliant Thing, the performer explicitly re-enacts conversations with a counsellor and mimics the therapy setting by sharing with the audience their feelings concerning the suicide of their mother. Similarly, in An Octoroon, the playwright’s alter ego BJJ makes himself vulnerable to the audience. However, the play also confronts spectators with hard truths about the history and topicality of racism that they may not be prepared to hear. Within the specific time frame of the shows, similar to the frame of a psychotherapy session, the two plays create self-contained affective spaces where feelings and emotions circulate between performers, spectators and among audience members.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference23 articles.

1. Benjamin, W., and A. Lacis. 1986. “Naples.” In Reflections. Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, edited by E. Jephcott, 163–73. New York: Schocken.

2. Bent, E. 2014. “Branden Jacobs-Jenkins: Feel That Thought.” In American Theatre. www.americantheatre.org/2014/05/15/brandenjacobsjenkins_appropriate_octoroon-2/ (accessed August 9, 2023).

3. Curry, Jane Kathleen. 2019. “Spectacle and Sensation in The Octoroon/An Octoroon.” Nineteenth Century Theatre and Film 46 (1): 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748372719826895.

4. Demory, P. 2019. “Queer/Adaptation: An Introduction.” In Queer/Adaptation, 1–13. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan.

5. Fischer-Lichte, E. 2005. Theatre, Sacrifice, Ritual: Exploring Forms of Political Theatre. London: Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3