Indirect Instrumentalism about Political Legitimacy

Author:

Brinkmann Matthias1

Affiliation:

1. Political Philosophy, Policy & Law , University of Virginia , Gibson Hall S495 , Charlottesville , VA 22904 , USA

Abstract

Abstract Political instrumentalism claims that the right to rule should be distributed such that justice is promoted best. Building on a distinction made by consequentialists in moral philosophy, I argue that instrumentalists should distinguish two levels of normative thinking about legitimacy, the critical and applied level. An indirect instrumentalism which acknowledges this distinction has significant advantages over simpler forms of instrumentalism that do not.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy

Reference58 articles.

1. Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty (New York: Crown Publishers).

2. Alexander, L. (1985). ‘Pursuing the Good–Indirectly’, Ethics 95 (2): 315–332.

3. Alexander, L. (1991). ‘The Gap’, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 14: 695–701.

4. Alexander, L. and Sherwin, E. (2001). The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (Durham: Duke University Press).

5. Applbaum, A. (2004). ‘Legitimacy in a Bastard Kingdom’, Center for Public Leadership Working Paper Series, Harvard Kennedy School, http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/55927 (accessed on 16th July 2018).

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The asymmetry between domestic and global legitimacy;Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy;2023-05-24

2. Towards Non-essentialism – Tracking Rival Views of Legitimacy as a Right to Rule;Oxford Journal of Legal Studies;2023-04-29

3. The Intransparency of Political Legitimacy;Philosophers' Imprint;2022-05-05

4. COVID-19, triage decisions, and indirect ethics: A model for the re-evaluation of triage guidelines;Ethics, Medicine and Public Health;2021-06

5. Everybody to Count for One? Inclusion and Exclusion in Welfare-Consequentialist Public Policy;Moral Philosophy and Politics;2021-02-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3