Political Machines: Ethical Governance in the Age of AI

Author:

McEvoy Fiona J.1

Affiliation:

1. Independent Scholar, 3467 17th Street, Apartment 3 , San Francisco , CA 94110 , USA

Abstract

Abstract Policymakers are responsible for key decisions about political governance. Usually, they are selected or elected based on experience and then supported in their decision-making by the additional counsel of subject experts. Those satisfied with this system believe these individuals – generally speaking – will have the right intuitions about the best types of action. This is important because political decisions have ethical implications; they affect how we all live in society. Nevertheless, there is a wealth of research that cautions against trusting human judgment as it can be severely flawed. This paper will look at the root causes of the most common errors of human judgment before arguing – contra the instincts of many – that future AI systems could take a range of political decisions more reliably. I will argue that, if/when engineers establish ethically robust systems, governments will have a moral obligation to refer to them as a part of decision-making.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy

Reference48 articles.

1. Asch, S.E. (1946). ‘Forming Impressions of Personality’, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41 (3): 258.

2. Baron, J. (2009). ‘Belief Overkill in Political Judgments’, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1427862

3. Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.W., Zou, J.Y., Saligrama, V., and Kalai, A.T. (2016). ‘Man Is to Computer Programmer as Woman Is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings’, in D.D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U.V. Luxburg, I. Guyon, and R. Garnett (eds.). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4349–4357.

4. Brennan, J. (2016). Against Democracy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).

5. Campolo, A., Sanfilippo, M., Whittaker, M., and Crawford, K. (2017). ‘AI Now 2017 Report’, AI Now.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3