Moral ambivalence. A comment on non-invasive prenatal testing from an ethical perspective-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Moral ambivalence. A comment on non-invasive prenatal testing from an ethical perspective

Published:2021-05-24 Issue:8 Volume:49 Page:949-952
ISSN:0300-5577
Container-title:Journal of Perinatal Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Heinrichs Bert¹²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Science and Ethics (IWE), University of Bonn , Bonner Talweg 57, 53113 Bonn , Germany

2. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Ethics in the Neurosciences (INM-8) , Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been available for almost 10 years. In many countries the test attracted considerable criticism from the start. While most critical comments in this context deal with the (alleged) problem of eugenic selection, I will concentrate on a somewhat broader issue. Content I will argue that NIPT clearly has the potential to increase reproductive autonomy and benefit expectant parents. However, NIPT can also put people in a situation that is morally overwhelming for them and from which there is no easy way out. In this sense, such tests can have a dilemma-generating effect. Summary and Outlook I will conclude that this can be adequately described by the term “moral ambivalence”.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2021-0194/pdf

Reference11 articles.

1. Chew, M, Sharrock, K. Medical Milestones. Celebrating key advances since 1840. Br Med J 2007;334:s1–22.

2. Worldometers. Life expectancy of the world population. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/demographics/life-expectancy/ [Accessed 11 Jan 2021].

3. United Nations Development Programme. Human development reports. Development of the human development Index (HDI) from 1990 to 2013. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators/137506 [Accessed 11 Jan 2021].

4. Lo, YM, Corbetta, N, Chamberlain, PF, Rai, V, Sargent, IL, Redman, CW, et al.. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet 1997;350:485–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02174-0.

5. Allyse, M, Minear, MA, Berson, E, Sridhar, S, Rote, M, Hung, A, et al.. Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges. Int J Women’s Health 2015;7:113–26. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S67124.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Preconception education program for non-invasive prenatal testing focused on interest in genetics among female university students in Japan: a quasi-experimental study comparing pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up results;Archives of Public Health;2023-07-27

2. BIOETHICAL DILEMMAS IN PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS: NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TEST AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES;CUAD BIOET;2023

3. Medical and Ethical Aspects of Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPT);Hot Topics in Human Reproduction;2023

4. Factors related to indecisive attitudes toward non‐invasive prenatal testing among women of reproductive age in Japan;Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research;2022-12-07

5. Some historical and general considerations on NIPT – great progress achieved, but we have to proceed with caution;Journal of Perinatal Medicine;2021-09-16