Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with delivery techniques for impacted fetal head at cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Rada Maria Patricia1ORCID,Ciortea Răzvan1,Măluțan Andrei Mihai1,Prundeanu Ioana1,Doumouchtsis Stergios K.23456ORCID,Bucuri Carmen Elena17,Blaga Ligia Daniela8,Mihu Dan1

Affiliation:

1. 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj-Napoca , Romania

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust , Epsom , UK

3. Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N. S. Christeas, Athens University Medical School , Athens , Greece

4. St George’s University of London , London , UK

5. American University of the Caribbean , School of Medicine , Pembroke Pines , Florida , USA

6. School of Medicine, Ross University , Miramar , FL , USA

7. Dr. Constantin Papilian Military Emergency Clinical Hospital , Cluj-Napoca , Romania

8. Department of Neonatology , “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj-Napoca , Romania

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Late first-stage or second-stage cesarean section is commonly associated with fetal head impaction, leading to maternal and neonatal complications. This situation requires safe delivery techniques, but the optimal management remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with delivery techniques via cesarean section. Methods An electronic search of three databases, from inception to June 2021, was conducted. Cohort and randomised comparative studies on maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with techniques to deliver an impacted fetal head during cesarean section were included. The methodological quality of the primary studies was assessed. Review Manager 5.4 was used for statistical analyses. Results Nineteen articles, including 2,345 women were analyzed. Three fetal extraction techniques were identified. Meta-analyses showed that the “pull” technique carries lower risks as compared to the “push” technique and the “Patwardhan” technique is safer compared to the “push” or the “push and pull” technique. Conclusions In the absence of robust evidence to support the use of a specific technique, the choice of the obstetrician should be based on best available evidence. Our study suggests that the “pull”, as well as the “Patwardhan” technique represent safe options to deliver an impacted fetal head.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery;Journal of Clinical Anesthesia;2024-12

2. Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean birth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis;Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica;2024-05-24

3. Essential notes: impacted fetal head;BJA Education;2024-03

4. Second Stage of Labor Cesarean Section Maternal and Fetal Outcomes;Clinical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology;2024-02-26

5. Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery;American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology;2023-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3