Impact of paternal presence and parental social-demographic characteristics on birth outcomes
Author:
Bamanikar Amruta A.1, Shah Shetal2, Aboudi David2, Mikkilineni Soumya2, Giblin Clare2, Lavan Tessa3, Brumberg Heather L.2
Affiliation:
1. Jersey Shore University Medical Center- an affiliate of-UMDNJ – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , Neptune , NJ , USA 2. Division of Newborn Medicine, The Regional Neonatal Center, New York Medical College, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital at Westchester Medical Center , Valhalla , NY , USA 3. CareMount Medical Group , Mt Kisco , NY , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Maternal race, marital status, and social environment impact risk of preterm delivery and size for gestational age. Although some paternal characteristics such as age are associated with pregnancy outcomes, the influence of the paternal presence, race/ethnicity and adverse life events is not well known. The objective of the study was to assess birth outcomes in mothers with a paternal presence compared to those without during the post-partum period. The secondary aim was to determine whether paternal race is associated with birth outcomes.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study using parental surveys linked with birth certificate data from 2016 to 2018. Adverse birth composite outcomes (ABCO) including small for gestational age (SGA), prematurity or neonatal intensive care unit admission (NICU) were assessed.
Results
A total of 695 parents were analyzed (239 single mothers and 228 mother-father pairs). Compared to mothers with a father present, mothers without a father present exhibited increased odds of ABCO, prematurity and NICU. Non-Hispanic Black fathers had increased odds of ABCO and NICU compared to Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Hispanic fathers had increased odds of NICU compared to NHW.
Conclusions
Paternal absence in the post-partum period and paternal race were both independently associated with ABCO and NICU. Assessment of paternal presence and paternal race in clinical practice may help identify opportunities for additional support necessary to optimize birth outcomes.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference51 articles.
1. Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Driscoll, AK, Mathews, TJ. Births: final data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2017;66:1. 2. Jensen, EA, Foglia, EE, Dysart, KC, Simmons, RA, Aghai, ZH, Cook, A, et al.. Adverse effects of small for gestational age differ by gestational week among very preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2019;104:F192–8, https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314171. 3. Harrison, W, Goodman, D. Epidemiologic trends in neonatal intensive care, 2007–2012. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:855–62, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1305. 4. McCowan, LM, Roberts, CT, Dekker, GA, Taylor, RS, Chan, EH, Kenny, LC, et al.. Risk factors for small-for-gestational-age infants by customized birthweight centiles: data from an international prospective cohort study. BJOG 2010;117:1599–607, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02737.x. 5. Vogel, JP, Chawanpaiboon, S, Moller, AB, Watananirun, K, Bonet, M, Lumbiganon, P. The global epidemiology of preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;52:3–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.04.003.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|