Affiliation:
1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology Huazhong , China
Abstract
Abstract
The present study investigated the developmental trajectories of written language of two Chinese EFL learners in terms of complexity over one semester and explored the relationship between syntactic complexity and lexical complexity under the framework of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST). The data were processed using dynamic analyses (min-max graphs, moving correlations and Change-point analysis) to visualize the developmental process and variability of each subsystem of complexity with 4 measures (mean length of T-unit, mean length of clause, clauses per T-unit and VocD) and interactions between different subsystems. The results showed, first, that different subsystems of written language complexity developed dynamically and nonlinearly with different degrees of variability, and varied in the two participants. Second, interactions existed between syntactic complexity and lexical complexity, which shaped as competitors for Jenny but as connected growers for Helen. The results further deepened the understanding of the development in learners’ written complexity, providing significant implications for EFL writing teaching.
Reference51 articles.
1. Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I., Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21-46). John Benjamins.
2. Caspi, T. (2010). A dynamic perspective on second language acquisition [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Groningen.
3. Chan, H., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L. (2015). Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning, 65(2), 298-325.
4. Chang, P., & Lawrence, Z. J. (2020). Idiodynamic research into EFL listeners’ directed motivational currents. Modern Foreign Languages, 43(2), 200-212.
5. de Bot, K. (2017). Complexity theory and dynamic systems theory: Same or different? In L. Ortega, & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development (pp. 51-58). John Benjamins.