1. Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds. ), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207-277). Berlin: De Gruyter.
2. Barcelona, A. (2003). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed. ), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 3158). Berlin: De Gruyter.
3. Barnden, J. A. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1-34.
4. Benczes, R. (2011). Putting the notion of“domain”back into metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds. ), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View (pp. 197-216). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
5. Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2009). The (non- ) metonymic use of place names in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian. In K. -U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds. ), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 229-257). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.