The poor performance of cardiovascular risk scores in identifying patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies at high cardiovascular risk

Abstract

Abstract Framingham risk score (FRS), systematic coronary risk evaluation (SCORE), the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk algorithm (ASCVD), and their modified risk scores are the most common cardiovascular risk scores. The aim of this case–control study was to evaluate the performance of cardiovascular risk scores in detecting carotid subclinical atherosclerosis (SCA) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). A total of 123 IIMs patients (71.5% female, mean age 50 ± 14 years) and 123 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included in this study. Carotid SCA was more prevalent in IIMs patients compared with controls (77.2 vs 50.4%, P < 0.001). Moreover, patients with carotid SCA+ had older age, and all risk scores were significantly higher in IIMs patients with SCA+ compared to subjects with SCA− (all P < 0.001). According to FRS, SCORE, and ASCVD risk scores, 77.9, 96.8, and 66.7% patients with SCA+ were classified as low risk category, respectively. The modified scores also demonstrated a modest improvement in sensitivity. Notably, by adopting the optimal cutoff values, these risk scores had good discrimination on patients with SCA+, with area under curves of 0.802–0.893. In conclusion, all cardiovascular risk scores had a poor performance in identifying IIMs patients at high cardiovascular risk.