Neurobiology of phenotypic plasticity in the light of climate change
Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity , Ruhr University Bochum , Universitätsstr. 150 , 44780 Bochum , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity describes the ability of an organism with a given genotype to respond to changing environmental conditions through the adaptation of the phenotype. Phenotypic plasticity is a widespread means of adaptation, allowing organisms to optimize fitness levels in changing environments. A core prerequisite for adaptive predictive plasticity is the existence of reliable cues, i.e. accurate environmental information about future selection on the expressed plastic phenotype. Furthermore, organisms need the capacity to detect and interpret such cues, relying on specific sensory signalling and neuronal cascades. Subsequent neurohormonal changes lead to the transformation of phenotype A into phenotype B. Each of these activities is critical for survival. Consequently, anything that could impair an animal’s ability to perceive important chemical information could have significant ecological ramifications. Climate change and other human stressors can act on individual or all of the components of this signalling cascade. In consequence, organisms could lose their adaptive potential, or in the worst case, even become maladapted. Therefore, it is key to understand the sensory systems, the neurobiology and the physiological adaptations that mediate organisms’ interactions with their environment. It is, thus, pivotal to predict the ecosystem-wide effects of global human forcing. This review summarizes current insights on how climate change affects phenotypic plasticity, focussing on how associated stressors change the signalling agents, the sensory systems, receptor responses and neuronal signalling cascades, thereby, impairing phenotypic adaptations.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Neurology
Reference62 articles.
1. Baker, T.C., Ochieng, S.A., Cossé, A.A., Lee, S.G., Todd, J.L., Quero, C., and Vickers, N.J. (2004). A comparison of responses from olfactory receptor neurons of Heliothis subflexa and Heliothis virescens to components of their sex pheromone. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sensory Neural Behav. Physiol. 190, 155–165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0483-2. 2. Bignami, S., Enochs, I.C., Manzello, D.P., Sponaugle, S., and Cowen, R.K. (2013). Ocean acidification alters the otoliths of a pantropical fish species with implications for sensory function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 7366–7370, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301365110. 3. Boullis, A., Fassotte, B., Sarles, L., Lognay, G., Heuskin, S., Vanderplanck, M., Bartram, S., Haubruge, E., Francis, F., and Verheggen, F.J. (2017). Elevated carbon dioxide concentration reduces alarm signaling in aphids. J. Chem. Ecol. 43, 164–171, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0818-z. 4. Bradshaw, A.D. (1965). Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 13, 115–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60048-6. 5. Chivers, D.P., Mccormick, M.I., Nilsson, G.E., Munday, P.L., Watson, S.A., Meekan, M.G., Mitchell, M.D., Corkill, K.C., and Ferrari, M.C.O. (2014). Impaired learning of predators and lower prey survival under elevated CO2: a consequence of neurotransmitter interference. Global Change Biol. 20, 515–522, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12291.
|
|